Steve,
Thx for the clarification.
Regards,
___________________________________________________________________________
Arthur Ryman
DE, Chief Architect, Reporting &
Portfolio Strategy and Management
IBM Software, Rational
Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) |
+1-416-939-5063 (mobile)
|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|[email protected]
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|05/15/2012 02:12 PM
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource definition
table columns? |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I don't think we are far off from saying the same things. I tried to
elaborate a bit below....
> From: Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: 04/20/2012 02:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Fw: what is the actual intent of resource
> definition table columns?
>
> Steve,
>
> My reply is [1]. I think I disagree with you.
>
> For Example 2, the occurence constraint is one or many. Therefore zero is
NOT allowed.
I agree. I just misread it as zero-or-more
> For Example 3, Either means that both representations are valid, i.e. the
> resource is "inlined" or just references via URI. Both client and server
> must be able to handle both representations.
Ok, we are arguing over MUST or MAY on this one. So I agree that when a
server advertises its support via the resource shape then it MUST support
this. I was taking the original "informative" approach to tables within
the specification, which I do not think we can treat as a MUST.
>
> [1] http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2012-
> April/001299.html
>
> Regards,
>
___________________________________________________________________________
>
> Arthur Ryman
- Steve
