Are we being authentic if we talk about self-organizing systems at the expense of spirit? Are we operating from a fear base? What exactly are we afraid of?
Thanks Michelle for you thoughtful reflections on simultaneity. I think for me the struggle is partly with the words/metaphors we use. I don't see "self-organizing" as being at the expense of spirit, but it based on my understanding of "self". At a very practical level, the facilitator is a different "self" from the "self" of the client group or organization. (At a deep level this may not be true. But, we constantly make arbitrary distinctions or boundaries in the continuum of reality, cats, dogs other people etc.) In the process of working with a group, the facilitator can "organize" much of the discussion or input with substantial precision -- e.g. Real Time Strategic Change. In the more guided approaches, the facilitator frames the questions, suggests the process and is up front much of the time. There are "spaces", say in a 1 hour table group discussion, where the group "organizes" its own discussion in relation to the guidance given. Proponents of those approaches would say that since the content of those parts of the discussion come from the group they are "self-organized" and often spirited. I've led such events and seen some real breakthroughs and dialogue in even short spaces between facilitator interventions. Open Space is different. Yes the "self" of the facilitator does "open the space" and give guidance to the overall process. However, the articulating of the principles and the law and creation of the "container" for the meeting creates the conditions for the "self" that is the group that's gathered to then organize its own meeting, the process and the content. In fact, for me the chaos at the wall is the point at which the "self" of the group takes the meeting from the "self" of the facilitator which now fades into the background to "hold the space". I have seen what I experience to be Spirit emerge in guided meetings. I experience it much more often in Open Space. The eastern religious traditions often talk about the "self" (individuals) and the "Self" (the one, the whole, God) as being difference in experience but one in essence. Meditation is about making them one in experience as well. So "self"-organizing in that context is the same as "Self" organizing. It is aobut how we use our words to inadequately describe reality. At least this is how I'm struggling to connect to the conversation. Larry
