hi there, people specializing in brain research say it takes 6 weeks of "reflection" or whatever for things to really materialize Congruently, I have been suggesting 6 to 8 weeks minimum The questions asked (and worked on in a structured manner, that is these are then tasks) -What did we agree on at the os (regarding a particular project) -What has taken place since then Short session (15 minutes) in project-centered groups Exchange of all that data with the whole group -What are the next steps Longer session of 30 minutes in project-centered groups Exchange in the whole group Further agreements of the whole group (we meet again, for instance, which is often the case) Feedback for the whole group on the meeting (the meeting takes 2,5 hours including a break at the start, a short view back to the os supported by posters, etc. from the os as decoration at the followup meeting) peace mmp
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:40:44 +0100, Gerard Muller wrote: >Hello Bernd, > >If I facilitate a one day event I usually have one follow-up meeting, as a >rule between 1-2 weeks afterwards. >I feel that's enough time to reflect over what has happened and not so long >that memories have faded, and energy >and motivation have started to go down. > >Content of the speech (but fill in anything you like) the way I used it was: > >I would invite to imagine that the next morning would be another meeting, in a >yearºs time (or whatever horizon >would seem to fit) and that the group had achieved enormous progress since the >Open Space. >And I would say we had agreed that before going on that meeting (a year from >now) a few would make a speech of a >few minutes, looking back. The story would be about >- where are we now, and what is different ? >- how has the journey been ? >- what were the main successes and problems, and how did we overcome those >problems ? >- how did this group support the journey ? > >Greetings from > > > > >Gerard Muller >Open Space Institute Denmark > > >WB-TrainingConsultingDevelopment wrote: > >> Gerard, >> >> since I have not really a clear picture, when you speak about "follow-up >> meeting" and "follow-up" I want to ask: >> 1. the "follow up meeting" is one immediately or in the hours after the >> final circle of the 1day event? >> 2. Did/do you specify what the speech should be about? >> >> Bernd >> >> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:47:01 +0100, Gerard Muller wrote: >> follow-up meeting with a smaller group to review and look at follow- >> up. I will then suggest everyone to prepare a 3 minute speech as it >> seems to work, it is fun and it still mostly uses intuition and >> energy. In a follow-up session I can really recommend it . >> >> * >> * >> ========================================================== >> [email protected] >> ------------------------------ >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, >> view the archives of [email protected], >> Visit: >> >> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html > >* >* >========================================================== >[email protected] >------------------------------ >To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, >view the archives of [email protected], >Visit: > >http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html Michael M Pannwitz boscop Draisweg 1 12209 Berlin, Germany FON +49 - 30-772 8000 FAX +49 - 30-773 92 464 www.michaelmpannwitz.de An der E-Gruppe "openspacedeutsch" für deutschsprechende open space-PraktikerInnen interessiert? Enfach eine mail an mich. * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected], Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
