Kim - You said: <What method will I use to do the prioritising of those topics requiring immediate attention?? And, once hot topics are found, shall I ask for a champion to nominate...>
I tend to think like dear Chris Corrigan, though I have used both the software for convergence Harrison has mentioned and the sticky-dot method (I agree with Kerry - I use 5 and say 'put all five on one, or distribute among several, or however you feel - don't sell, tear in half, or push someone's hand as they are placing their dot' ;0) ) But I find more and more that 'non-convergence', or as I call it reopening the space, works just as well and maybe better. When it comes down to it, often convergence leads to less, and to giving up of passionate issues for the good of the whole. Which is fine, depending on the objectives and the design and the needs of the Open Space (for example if it was great to have folks raise emerging issues but in the end a committee needs to know the group's thought on what the majority feels about which 5 to fund first, or so on). As it often turns out, having 'champions' name issues and lead action groups for an hour, as Chris mentions, keeps the highest energy items moving forward quite nicely, and even new things that lead to marvelous projects and outcomes can be raised in this reopening. Choices, choices, eh? Warmly, Lisa ________________________________ L i s a H e f t Consultant, Facilitator, Educator O p e n i n g S p a c e 2325 Oregon Berkeley, California 94705-1106 USA +01 510 548-8449 [email protected] www.openingspace.net * * ========================================================== [email protected] ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of [email protected], Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
