hi peggy,
this response was very well articulated by you. clearly open space is
2t.
steve banks demonstrates why i have turned away from spiral dynamics
and wilber's integralism --
so many people use it to play the one-up game.
basically all he did was make a straw dog of open space and critique it
and erect his own model, that as you pointed out was open space in
actuality.
congrats and thanks on a response well formulated.
On Aug 26, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Peggy Holman wrote:
Hhmmmm, I notice the attachments aren't attached. Here are links
instead:
From Steve Banks:
http://www.opencirclecompany.com/FromOpenSpaceToIntegralSpace.doc
My response: http://www.opencirclecompany.com/IntegralOpenSpace.doc
still sunny in Seattle,
Peggy
----- Original Message -----
From: Peggy Holman
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:00 PM
Subject: [OSLIST] An OS "critique" and response
My friend, Tom Atlee, sent me the attached doc, From Open
Space...egral Space.doc, by Steve Banks. It struck me as so
misinformed and error filled that I responded with Integral Open
Space.doc.
Thought you might find both the impressions of a neophyte and my
response of interest.
from sunny Seattle,
Peggy
________________________________
Peggy Holman
The Open Circle Company
15347 SE 49th Place
Bellevue, WA 98006
(425) 746-6274
www.opencirclecompany.com
* * ==========================================================
[email protected] ------------------------------ To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
[email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about
OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
