Doug,
If the facilitator is part of the system, such as at an OSonOS or at
a professional association meeting, I think there can be value in
participating. I've seen this happen many times, and I think it
depends on the situation.
At its best, facilitator participation is a way of modeling the flow
between leadership and followership.
I think it works best when there is a fair amount of trust and/or
when the issues being discussed are so big (e.g. Climate Change) that
it's clear no one person could be "the expert."
I like that you've posed the question to explore the up sides of
facilitator participation... and I look forward to others' thoughts.
I recently posed a similar question to a group of personal &
professional coaches, something like: If you have expertise in the
subject being discussed, do you share it with your client? The answer
was pretty unanimous: These coaches would choose to share their
professional expertise / knowledge if they though it would be useful
to the larger process, AND they said they would be very clear with
the client that they were removing their "coach" hat and putting on
their "author/engineer/whatever" hat for a while.
Gabriel
--
Gabriel Shirley
BigMind Consulting
[email protected]
206-388-5106
http://bigmindconsulting.com
Linked in profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gabrielshirley
Blog: http://blog.gabrielshirley.com
On Jul 30, 2007, at 9:01 AM, douglas germann wrote:
Hi--
Peggy Holman's Change Handbook has a description of Conversation
Cafés,
which raises the question: why would it be good for the facilitator to
take part in the conversation? What would be the advantages of taking
part?
After all, it appears that the host in Conversation Cafés does take
part, in circle process does take part, and in The World Café may take
part in the conversations.
The risks it seems to me: the facilitator is seen as the one with the
answers, simply because of standing at the front/center of the
room; the
temptation, even subconsciously, to push your own agenda because of
that
standing position.
But the advantages might outweigh: one more voice heard; a more
inclusive whole to the group.
We seem to avoid taking part in the conversations: Harrison takes a
nap;
Michael only does it in a middle time slot.
Could we have a conversation about why it would be good to
participate,
please?
:- Doug.
*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
