I've used the grid almost exclusively, working with a predominantly technical audience. At one OS, someone else facilitated when I wasn't available, and went gridless. The feedback I got was that the attendees missed the grid.

Which doesn't say that grid is better, just that it works well for this particular group.

Maybe I'll prep them the next time and go gridless with them.

..Doc
--
Steven "Doc" List, Principal Consultant, ThoughtWorks NA
Stage Producer, New to Agile stage, Agile2009 Conference (http://agile2009.agilealliance.org ) Mobile: +1 (512) 924-9248 | Skype: steven.list | Yahoo: dadjester | Twitter: athought
Facebook: athought | LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/stevenlist
email: d...@thoughtworks.com | d...@anotherthought.com | web: 
www.thoughtworks.com

Read about communication and facilitation on my blog: 
http://www.stevenlist.com/blog




On Aug 4, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Jack Martin Leith wrote:

I'd like to add a couple of points:

1) Why have a "rule" about this? Different events call for different mechanics.

2) From what I've seen, BarCamps have a grid and no Post-its.

At the BarCamp I was part of, it never occurred to the organisers that they could add another column to the grid and thereby accommodate another bunch of sessions.

Best wishes to all,

Jack

Jack Martin Leith
Bristol, United Kingdom
Mobile: 07831 840541 (+44 7831 840541)
Skype: jackmartinleith
email: j...@jackmartinleith.com
www.jackmartinleith.com


2009/8/4 Larry Peterson <la...@spiritedorg.com>
The only "grid" I use is the one I put the post-its on. I prefer the free form posting of topics on the wall, and maybe some splitting of Day 1 and Day 2. For me, the chaos at the wall is intentional and if its not there, then the benefits of being at the "edge of chaos" are not achieved. People have to use their intuition as well as logic when deciding what topic to
pursue. It is clearly not a traditional agenda.

Larry


Larry Peterson & Associates in Transformation
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
la...@spiritedorg.com   416.653.4829 http://www.spiritedorg.com



-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Jon Harvey
Sent: August-04-09 4:48 AM
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: Re: [OSLIST] Why is a grid sometimes useful?

Erik

I have mostly created grids using making tape which certainly looks more like a 'standard' agenda - rows for time slots and columns for places. That
is their main value I think...

However I have experienced several difficulties:

1) Merging and combining discussions becomes a bit constrained
2) You need a big wall - which is often not available
3) I was always left wondering why we had the post-it notes and the
scheduled box on the grid - as they duplicated each other - in effect.
4) If a balloon popped (or escaped - see by blog for a pic!
http://jonharveyassociates.blogspot.com/ ) all the sheets for that session
had to be moved.

So now I favour the freeform - but slightly organised - approach. I choose X wall spaces (where X is the number of time slots) and ask people to post their discussions there - attaching the appropriate sticky note (11.00ish and balloon G). People can consult the wall space at any time and see laid out, the various sessions that are happening at that time. This can apply to new people also - if they helped, as need be, to understand what it all means - which takes 10 seconds in my experience. Merging discussions is also far easier with this method. It also does not give any spurious 'order' to
the ideas - because they are arranged higgledy-piggledy.

For finding the discussions - I usually opt for large letter shaped balloons suspended 2m from the floor. If you are sponsoring session D - you go and
get the D balloon and a flip chart and see who turns up. (see
http://www.classiccelebrations.com/images/categories/alphabetletteraballooni
mage.jpg for an example)

Hope this helps...

Very best wishes

Jon
___________________________________________________

Jon Harvey
Director

www.jonharveyassociates.co.uk
+44 (0) 7771 537535
+44 (0) 1280 822585

j...@jonharveyassociates.co.uk


Helping you connect the prose and the passion
to deliver superlative results

http://smallcreativeideas.blogspot.com/ for ideas about how to improve
public services
http://jonharveyassociates.blogspot.com/ for articles, ideas & ramblings
linked to my consultancy

Jon Harvey Associates Ltd
Registered Office: Chandos House, School Lane, Buckingham, MK18 1HD
Company Number 6661588. VAT Registration Number 936 2921 11



-----Original Message-----
From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Erik
Fabian
Sent: 04 August 2009 05:08
To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
Subject: [OSLIST] Why is a grid sometimes useful?

Hello,

I have been thinking about the bulletin board and the debate that happened a
while back on this
list about whether a totally free collage of session postings is somehow
better than OS style events
that use a grid layout that notes time/locations.

I agree that the complete free flowing collage approach has an elegant
appeal but I have been
asking myself a different question...why do some OS style events even use a
grid?

I wonder how did the use of the grid evolve at these events? What is their
value?

I can only speculate on how these event evolved into using a grid (or if
that is how they started out
perhaps) but I have realize one advantage...they allow new participants to
easily to join in with an
event that is already in progress.

When someone shows up late to a public event and encounters a messy session
board it is hard,
without further explanation, for them to understand what is going on, where
it is happening, if it
is happening, and if so when.

The original OS literature I have read usually emphasizes that participants
are present start to
finish. There are many obvious benefits to this but the relevant one here is
that everyone is
present during the original board making. They have some sense of how it
evolved into whatever
mess that it becomes and how it changes as people go about the experience.

It makes sense if the original OS literature isn't accounting late arrivals
that it doesn't need
something like a grid to help late arrivals get oriented quickly.

Thoughts?

Cheerio,
Erik

*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

* * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist


*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to