:D
Will quote that too
:o)
Eva

Skickat från min iPhone

11 dec 2011 kl. 17:10 skrev Phelim McDermott <[email protected]>:

> In other words I shall quote you Harrison 
> 
> "Be the space you wish to see in the world!" : Harrison Owen 
> 
> Love 
> 
> Phelim X
> ________________________________
> 
> I generally pick up emails only at the beginning and end of the working day. 
> I am currently aiming to respond the following day. If it is urgent please 
> call me on 07956 187298. 
> _____________________________________
> 
> www.improbable.co.uk
> @openspacer
> 
> 
> On 11 Dec 2011, at 10:44, Harrison Owen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Bernard – Very thoughtful and well done! Thank you!! And a further note on 
>> space. I would agree that having sufficient break out space is important, 
>> but I think that “sufficient” is always in the eyes of the beholder. Odd way 
>> of talking, I guess – but we have all run into situations where there was 
>> plenty of square feet/meters – but somehow it seemed cramped (a boring 
>> party). As well as the reverse – everybody was packed together, but somehow 
>> there was plenty of “room” (a cheerful night at the pub). My take is that 
>> space is much more a matter of feeling than physics.
>>  
>> I have certainly seen this operational in multiple OST’s. I think of those 
>> times when the main room was so cramped, or worse, shaped like a bowling 
>> alley – and everybody was sitting on top of each other. As for the “break 
>> out” spaces… BUT it all worked magnificently.  And the question is 
>> naturally, “How come?”
>>  
>> Part of it may be cultural dispositions towards large and small spaces. 
>> People raised in our far west (Plains states) feel cramped if they can see 
>> another person – miles away. By contrast, Italians (some of my best friends) 
>> get so close that I, as an American, feel more than a little claustrophobic. 
>> Were I to have said something (I wouldn’t) my friends would have been hurt. 
>> Something about not liking “their space” I guess. J
>>  
>> When it comes to Open Space, I think there may be something else operative – 
>> which is what we as the facilitator bring to the party. If our space is 
>> fully open (really present and clear of obstructions), I suspect that can 
>> and does establish a sense of “spaciousness” which has nothing to do with 
>> square footage. By the same token if we come from a place of closed personal 
>> space – we are thinking about all the things we should be doing, worrying 
>> about the size of the venue, contemplating next week’s assignment, the 
>> initial “spaciousness” can be cut by quantum factors. Maybe?
>>  
>> Harrison
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Harrison Owen
>> 7808 River Falls Dr.
>> Potomac, MD 20854
>> USA
>>  
>> 189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)
>> Camden, Maine 20854
>>  
>> Phone 301-365-2093
>> (summer)  207-763-3261
>>  
>> www.openspaceworld.com
>> www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST 
>> Go to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>  
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bernhard Weber
>> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 6:19 AM
>> To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
>> Subject: Re: [OSList] Why I Actually Like Calling it "The Law of Two Feet"
>>  
>> Dear Peggy and all
>>  
>> I fully agree to your YING/YANG interpretation of these two aspects. 
>> And when I read, what you wrote, I walked mentally back to my old 
>> "politically radical times". In spring of 1976, a big area in 
>> Vienna/Austria, that had been used as "Auslandsschlachthof" (forein imports 
>> slaughterhouse) by the municipal services was about to be sold to a 
>> consortium of garment importers. We thought, we need a real good place for 
>> the culture of the young people and - inspired by Freetown Kristiania in 
>> Denmark - we occupied the area and the Viennese ARENA was born. 
>>  
>> For months an unbelievable diversity of groups and activities met there and 
>> did wonderful things. We had the bikers club of the Simmeringer (low income 
>> area in Vienna) Buam (boys) there, lots of cultural events, even Leonard 
>> Cohen passed by and sang for free, there were a children house and a social 
>> service, lots of guests from outside coming for concerts and strolling 
>> through the ARENA, there was upper and lower class, foreigners like the 
>> "Collegium Hungaricum" (at times of the iron curton, do not forget that). We 
>> had a system of working groups and a plenary. Decisions taken by both. 
>>  
>> And it was all joyful and peaceful.
>> In the end, too much money was involved.  The city sold the 
>> Auslandsschlachthof and offered some petty area nearby for cultural events 
>> (still being called ARENA WIEN, but something completely different). We went 
>> out without violence but a big "ARENA funeral" walked through the town. And 
>> it was over.
>>  
>> I was very young then, a student and although having done a good (small) 
>> group dynamics trainer training at Vienna University of Sociology before, I 
>> simply could not understand, why this all had worked. Well, as the 
>> co-founder of the first free school for 10-15 year old pupils, I had some 
>> clues that getting rid of the usual "everyday trance" was an important 
>> factor, but was still unable to discriminate between the pre-conditions for 
>> situations where it worked (like ARENA, free schools, some undogmatic 
>> leftist political events....) and when it did not work (IT being high 
>> diversity, time pressure, lots of conflicts around,....)
>>  
>> For years, even centuries that followed a part of my studies was dedicated 
>> to understand exactly this: 
>> WHY HAD IT WORKED?
>>  
>> I continued my learning about groups and organizations. I learned more about 
>> large group dynamics, facilitated learning workshops, became more and more 
>> experienced in refined facilitation techniques, etc. 
>>  
>> But this only increased my impression that nobody could give me a 
>> comprehensive explanation. 
>> And that theoretically (especially large group theory - wise) it COULD NOT 
>> HAVE WORKED.
>>  
>> Around 1987 I first heard about something called OPEN SPACE. Nothing very 
>> detailed but specific enough to hear about the law of the two feet and the 
>> resistance to predefine what the participates would deal with.
>> So without further ado I just tried it at the final event of a district 
>> development project at Cape Verde Island (where I worked at that period in 
>> time). All stakeholders of the project were invited. With amazing process 
>> and results.
>>  
>> Some years later, I was lucky and could learn from Harrison how to do it 
>> properly and hear more about the knots and bolts.
>>  
>> And it was clear. ARENA had been one of these spontaneous, not prepared, 
>> OPEN SPACES that happened again and again in the world.
>>  
>> And when I was invited to talk at the Pankahyttn (Punks Hut) in Vienna last 
>> year  (the Pankahyttn is itself a newly occupied - small - space in VIENNA 
>> town), it was this learning I could offer:
>>  
>> ARENA Wien had worked because the LAW of TWO FEET had been appliable.
>> 1) by the non-rules of ARENA
>> 2) by the enormous space we had, so each of the groups and sub-groups could 
>> occupy their own space, come out, go back...
>>  
>> And it was applied, not as a rule, but as a natural thing under these 
>> conditions. 
>> And the de-facto-emergenc of the OS principles had then been a simple 
>> consequence in the ARENA context.
>> (The fifth law was not yet formulated last year, so I could only say: "it 
>> was not an OPEN SPACE in the sense of OST, but still, the OS spirit was 
>> there")
>>  
>>  
>> And that is the reason why I post this here (in fact it's a small point and 
>> nearly a truism):
>>  
>> It is true that the YING/YANG of the law of the two feet allows such things 
>> to happen. 
>> But at a theoretical level we should not forget 
>> that there exists a physical pre-condition: 
>> ENOUGH BREAK-OUT SPACE
>> So that the (conflicting) groups and individuals can get out of each others 
>> way
>>  
>> If there is not enough physical space available
>> the law is not appliable
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> Bernd Weber
>> Change Facilitation s.r.o., A Global Partner Who Makes Change Happen in 
>> Complex Environments; www.change-facilitation.com, 
>> www.change-management-toolbook.com [email protected]; 
>> Regional Phone  numbers: 
>> -Austria: +43 664 135 4828, landline + 431 5968657)
>> -Sri Lanka: landline +94 11 2785859, iPhone +94 777740757
>>  
>>  
>> NEW: Intensive Learning Workshop 
>> "Playing with the Waves of Change" 
>> www.change-facilitation.com/
>>  
>> You want to have the design  for a "Playing with the Waves (of Change) WS 2 
>> completely taylor-made according to your individual learning interests & 
>> needs & limitations? Then have a look to the questionnaire at
>> www.surveymonkey.com/s/5ZDS6JQ
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> If you get Email from my account <[email protected]> 
>> please do not use the reply button but answer to <[email protected]>, because my 
>> change-facilitation.org INBOX is not working for the time being.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> Am 11.12.2011 um 04:17 schrieb Peggy Holman:
>> 
>> 
>> I just read through several months of OSlist messages and am picking up this 
>> old thread because it inspires me to tell a story.
>>  
>> Phelim, like others, I like your naming the movement "toward" and "away" in 
>> the Law of Two Feet.  
>>  
>> When I introduce the Law of Two Feet, I speak of these dynamics because of 
>> an exchange I had the privilege to witness shortly after I ran into Open 
>> Space.
>>  
>> It was a conversation between the two people who have most influenced my 
>> thinking and practice of opening space: Harrison (of course) and Anne 
>> Stadler.  For those who don't know Anne, she has been involved with Open 
>> Space since the OS in Goa India.  I think that was in 1989.  Shortly after 
>> that trip, Anne, who was a TV producer at the time invited Harrison to make 
>> the first video on Open Space Technology, called Learning in Open Space.  
>> I'm not positive about this, but I think Harrison and Anne then offered the 
>> first OST workshops.
>>  
>> Anyway, a few years after that, probably around 1996, during a trip to 
>> Seattle, Anne and Harrison were talking about the Law of 2 Feet.  Harrison 
>> spoke of it as a safety valve.  He said something similar to this OSlist 
>> message by him from Nov. 24, 2001 [I put some text in bold]:
>>  
>> ... I would guess that there are situations where a more active role might 
>> be required, but I have never run into one. Even when the level of conflict 
>> is very high and the issues are old and deep. For example, in South Africa 
>> in the days shortly after Mendela's release from prison we  did Open Spaces 
>> with such folks as Zulus, Hausa, Afrikaners -- all together, and no problem. 
>> I have often wondered why this is true, and my best guess is that The Law of 
>> Two Feet provides the needed "safety-valve"  Folks come together because 
>> they want to solve some issues. At the same time I think it to be true that 
>> nobody (save for a few pathological types) really like to blow their cool, 
>> so to speak. The desire to solve the issue brings them together, and the Law 
>> enables each individual to judge when they need a walk around the block to 
>> "cool off." I have seen this lots of time, and never seen it to fail.
>>  
>> That made sense to me!  Then Anne talked about the Law of Two Feet as a 
>> reminder to stand on your two feet for what you believe in. (Unfortunately, 
>> I don't have a comparable "in her own words" message.)
>>  
>> As I listened to their exchange, all I could think was, "they're both 
>> right!"  I had a sense that between them, Harrison and Anne had expressed 
>> the yin and yang of the law.  Sometimes the ability to walk away and cool 
>> off is useful.  And at other times, remembering the importance of taking a 
>> stand is what's called for.  
>>  
>> That conversation influenced how I've opened space ever since.  When I 
>> introduce the Law of Two Feet, I talk about these two actions.  
>>  
>> Sounds a lot like moving towards and moving away, yes?
>>  
>> appreciatively,
>> Peggy
>>  
>>  
>> _________________________________
>> Peggy Holman
>> [email protected]
>>  
>> 15347 SE 49th Place
>> Bellevue, WA  98006
>> 425-746-6274
>> www.peggyholman.com
>> www.journalismthatmatters.org
>>  
>> Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity
>>  
>> "An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not get burnt, 
>> is to become 
>> the fire".
>>   -- Drew Dellinger
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Caitlin Frost wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for articulating this Phelim.
>>  
>> For me the Law of Two Feet is definitely about movement.  Nice to notice the 
>> "toward" in balance to the "away from" - and underneath that for me is just 
>> the invitation to wise movement to follow my flow - to open space for that 
>> for everyone.
>>  
>> And my practice can be in noticing what would stop me from moving when that 
>> feels right, and working with that.  I can see how that serves me in life 
>> and work both in and beyond Open Space.
>>  
>> Your post here sharpened my ear for the phrasing - and in two recent Open 
>> Space openings I heard more clearly the speaking of this law as "away from" 
>> without the equal balance of towards.  I will be more mindful now - when 
>> offering it myself, or teaching it to others.
>>  
>> I like to think of it like I sometimes see little kids moving around.  Not 
>> even needing a story to explain why they are moving.  There doesn't have to 
>> be a reason or problem to leave - they just go when they are ready and find 
>> themselves in the next place.  Eager faced - 'hey what's happening over 
>> here?'
>>  
>> Thanks for offering some attention here.
>>  
>> Caitlin.
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Phelim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  
>> In open space technology there is only one law. It’s know as “The Law of Two 
>> Feet” Some people don’t like calling it this and it is objected to on the 
>> grounds of diversity/disability issues. So it gets re-christened “The law of 
>> mobility”. However, I think it’s a very useful metaphor and as such think 
>> all should have access to it. However that’s not what I want to talk about 
>> today.
>> 
>> Sometimes people concentrate on “The law of two feet.” as being about 
>> leaving somewhere: it might be a session, a person who is dominating a 
>> conversation, a topic that goes off somewhere you are no longer interested 
>> in, all these are things one might want to move away from.
>> 
>> However it’s good to remember it’s a law of TWO feet. Let’s say the first 
>> foot or step is away from. Then the second step in terms of our metaphor 
>> could be what we are moving towards. If the emphasis is just on the first 
>> step the potential energy or even an awareness of the second step can get 
>> overwhelmed. Veiled in issues of possibility or social politeness.
>> 
>> So remember both aspects of the Law: “away from” but also “towards”. Where 
>> have you already taken yourself or your mind? Where inside yourself have you 
>> already taken your next step somewhere else?
>> 
>> This is a useful thing to remember not least because it might support you 
>> over the threshold of your imagined impoliteness or arrogance when you find 
>> yourself worrying about the fact that you are leaving somewhere and being 
>> rude.
>> 
>> Maybe if you focus on where you are going to or where your presence has 
>> gone.. Then you could realise it might be rude to have already left a less 
>> than present self amongst the group. Or perhaps it’s even arrogant to assume 
>> people will even notice that you left.
>> 
>> So whether you are attending to “The Law of Two Feet” or “The Law of 
>> Mobility: Focus on the TWO feet of the dynamic and as Hal and Sidra Stone 
>> say “Sweat the choice”.
>>  
>>  
>> Love Phelim
>>  
>> http://www.tumblr.com/tumblelog/clusterform
>> 
>>  
>> ________________________________
>>  
>> I generally pick up emails only at the beginning and end of the working day. 
>> I am currently aiming to respond the following day. If it is urgent please 
>> call me on 07956 187298. 
>> _____________________________________
>>  
>> www.improbable.co.uk
>> @openspacer
>> @Wosonos2012
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> -- 
>> UPCOMING WORKSHOPS in the transformative inquiry process of The Work:  
>> Open Heart - Bowen Island, Nov. 4-6; Weekend retreat, Nova Scotia May 4-6, 
>> 2012; The Work at work/business, Edmonton May 26 & 27, 2012
>> www.caitlinfrost.ca
>>  
>> The Art of Hosting Conversations That Matter, Bowen Island, BC, October 23 - 
>> 26th.
>> 
>> If you really knew how beautiful you are, 
>> you would fall at your own feet.
>> Byron Katie.  
>> 
>> CAITLIN FROST
>> Coaching and Facilitation
>> Certified Facilitator - The Work of Byron Katie
>> Principal - Harvest Moon Consultants Ltd.
>> www.caitlinfrost.ca
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to