Hello Lee I also had a very positive experience of using open space with deaf persons. One event I fact at ed was with 100 women of varying  abilities. I had one deaf person and one deaf blind person (and her seeing eye dog!) each with an. Intervenor. One had a computer so she could read. on a small table that integrated easily in the circle and the other had the intervenor sign on her palm. As Dianne said, it was a matter of speaking slower and simplifying my opening to the basics.  I was able to walk the circle, and had a profound learning from the deaf blind woman about the power of doing so. She said that she could hear a louder sound when I was close and softer when I was away. She could feel my presence when I walked by her. She said it made her feel included and thanked me. She also posted a topic and hosted a Session. She loved the experience. 
 
Last summer we facilitated an OST meeting for 600. The sponsors had placed a round stage at the Centre . There was a person signing the opening on the stage and it was also broadcast on 2 or3 large video screens.(there is a much bigger story that I will share at some later time about this OST that was powerful in spite of all of the barriers that we encountered) we had super huge posters made and also had the content of the posters on the video screens that followed our up ending. Given the acoustics of the room I think more people would have benefit ted from knowing sign language. Much depends on the size of the group and room.
I would live to be in the energy of your space for the OST. 
Good luck.
Michelle

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

From: Diane Gibeault
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:01 AM
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
Reply To: Diane Gibeault
Subject: Re: [OSList] OS with Sign Language as a first language

Hi Lee,

I facilitated an Open Space meeting for deafened people, people who once heard and spoke but have now lost their hearing completely or in good part and have not necessarily learned sign language or lip reading. The invitation from a volunteer organization went to the community at large.
 
Over twenty people met for half a day. The theme was focussed on service and access needs of deafened people. Communication was assisted by interpreters, sound enhancing ear plugs and simultaneous captioning services enabling participants to read spoken words on a large screen.
 
We were able to preserve the formation of the full circle of chairs by having some of the hearing participants (partner accompanying a deafened participant, sponsor of the organization, sign language interpreter and facilitator) sit at one end of the circle, their backs to the screen which other participants needed to see.
 
As the facilitator I could not walk in the circle while speaking because it would have interfered with the view of the screen but I did walk around the circle once without speaking. I had told the group I would do so and that at the same time, they were invited to let their eyes go around the circle, acknowledging the richness of the people present. I made eye contact with everyone, we all smiled and nodded to welcome each other and they did the same with other participants. The circle was bound.
 
Harisson Owen’s “less is more” never was so true. To explain the process, I had to speak slowly, using few words, choosing key important ones so that the captioning note takers and interpreters would represent the ideas as clearly and as completely as possible. Otherwise, they will cut on what was said or put it in words that may not reflect as well what you wanted to say. Beth Martin a OS trainee who assisted in the Open Space was asked by the sponsor to take the role of reading the screen and signalling to me when I had to slow down. If a message had been really distorted, she would have caught it and let me know.
 
Participants wrote their topics and only when all had finished did they take turns to announce them from their seat. This way, everyone could look at the screen or interpreter. Otherwise, they would have missed the topic announcements because they would be looking at their sheet while writing their own topic. Participants with topics then picked up a Post-it with time and place and put up their topics on the wall. After this first round, some came up with more ideas for topics and we proceeded in the same way again.
 
Once all the topics were on the wall, further instructions were given and off they went to sign up. If they needed to negotiate combinations or time changes, they could communicate with each other by writing on the paper pad they were given or calling upon an interpreter. Each meeting site had a large screen computer and a note taker and participants sat around to read on the screen what was being said. Interpreters went where they were needed. There was a talking piece at every meeting site to help see who was speaking. A real break was scheduled between the two discussion rounds to give everyone a rest from reading.
 
Discussion reports were completed after the event, given it was only a half day meeting. For reporting to the entire group at the end of the event, two flip charts were placed near the circle in the plenary room and initiators had been invited to write two or three lines that captured the key idea or action coming out of their discussion. This encouraged them to organize their thoughts and it condensed the reporting period. Initiators read their two line reports that were captured by the interpreters and the larger screen. Participants exchanged comments, reactions and more stories.
 
For the closing, the talking piece worked like it always does and words came from the heart to bring meaningful closure to this event.
 
They were energised by this kind of exchange that brought them out of their isolation
They would have wanted to keep on. They talked about having another meeting. This kind of experience was a first of its kind for these participants and for this community of people with hearing challenges.
 
The speed at which  participants took charge of the process, the level of participation, the energy and the enthusiasm about the results and about this way of meeting were the same as for all the other open space groups I have facilitated. Open Space does work with any group as long as there is passion for the reason that brings people together.
 
Enjoy,

Diane


From: Lee Simpson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:32:35 AM
Subject: [OSList] OS with Sign Language as a first language

Hi all,

We are planning an OS with BSL (British Sign Language) as a first language. Anybody done something like this and have any tips about things like sight lines during opening, announcing of sessions and closing circle?

Thanks.

Lee
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org



_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to