…and a brief report back.
Woow - last Friday the energy was back again. Lots of energy all through the 
day and relieved leadership (-:
Apart from skipping the presentations, the top leader had sharpened the 
introduction with more focus on his/their vision - good to best.
Then I had looked over some details that were not perfect the previous time 
such as coffee in place earlier and a better area for having coffee and a chat 
before entering the room. Although I always prepare the room for about 3 hours 
the day before I love to be an hour before the next morning, the previous 
Friday I accepter 1/2 hour. This time I asked for a full hour of being, before 
they arrived… I also put a flower in the center (with the stones and the 
patchwork). The leader sat opposite me in the circle. 
Another thing. The leadership team asked if it was OK they brought topics if 
they feel a need. I answered that of course they can, but only if they feel 
something in their interest is missing, not to save anything but to add 
something they miss. So they brought some of the 19 topics.

I opened space in about the same way, maybe a bit more "on my 
toes"/focused/sharpened - anyhow, both times a full opening even though most of 
them did it before. I agree it's an important ritual.

So what effect do different adjustments have? Was it the flower? 
Well, that the message was more clear from leadership + no presentation - I 
think were the major reasons behind that the energy was so much higher this 
time. Good learning for all of us.

Some people thought that there was a little too much time during the day. So 
maybe next time (if the situation is similar) we can have a little shorter 
day/session times. We went from 8-17 with 3 sessions á 1,5 hours sessions + 
reading, re-opening and 45-60 mts for working with action plans and closing. 

So there were in all 18 action plans produced in these 2 events. 9 on each of 
the two days. On October 1st we'll meet with the sponsors and the leadership 
team, to give space to share what has happened so far, think about if they want 
to merge/cooperate between groups and plan next steps (usually I recommend this 
meeting is within 2 weeks).
Cheers
Thomas





26 aug 2014 kl. 15:23 skrev Thomas Herrmann <[email protected]>:

> Hi dear Michael, thanks for asking
> I'll share some more…
> SHORT OR LONG OST
> One of the persons in the leadership team of the department I am working with 
> had somehow heard about OST and got in touch with me. Originally they had 
> other plans for the second day but wanted OST for the first. So I met with 
> the team and shared how I work with OST - focus on thorough pre-work and 
> follow up - and of course I got very excited to learn they actually had two 
> staff days planned. When I shared my excitement it started to spread…and 
> finally they decided to go for the whole thing. This is actually my 
> experience since a few years back. When I became more confident, excited 
> about the opportunities a real OST can give, including pre work and follow up 
> - and share it, they more and more often get it. So I don't believe anyone 
> saying they don't have time. Because what happened during these two days 
> would, as we all know, have taken loooooong time and is not even possible the 
> "traditional way"…
> 
> You had a couple more questions in relation to this. I think in this case 
> they have a tradition of having a 2-day retreat every 2nd year. When they 
> understood that they can get something really valuable, lasting out of it, 
> they went for it. I think that first they got interested in OST because it 
> seemed "fun". But when they understood the power it can open up in the 
> organization, they got excited. Many organizations have these kind of 
> retreats but usually they don't have a real purpose besides having a good 
> time together...
> 
> THEME
> So we had 2 full days with half of the staff (100+ persons) one week and the 
> next week the other half. The theme was something like (a bit hard to 
> translate) XX-clinic in change. How are we going to "fix" it? (means what do 
> we do out of it). Do you dare to join?
> 
> DESIGN/FOLLOW UP
> It was very high energy days both occasions although it was interesting to 
> see that there was a bit more grief/problems coming up day 1 of the second 
> conference. Anyhow both occasions had about 12 action plans, in total 23! (I 
> used re-opening the space for this + had 2 sessions for action planning 
> during the afternoon of day 2)
> 2 weeks later I facilitated a follow up meeting with the leadership team and 
> all sponsors of action teams. I use Whole Person Process facilitation as a 
> container for this kind of meetings, sometimes blended with OST but this time 
> I chose Worldcafé melted into the meeting, as we had identified a few 
> questions that the leaders wanted to process: 
> How to let the principles/law live on. 
> The role of action plan sponsor. 
> Follow up/report backs/communication. 
> How to make decisions and implement these projects. 
> + a couple of open tables for "other questions"
> Anyhow, we used a grid to see how/if any of the action plans could merge or 
> cooperate. A few decided to merge and a few decided to cooperate. Down the 
> road they had regular report backs visiting the leadership team as well as in 
> staff meetings. They have also started to use intranet, but it's been a bit 
> slow there I think.
> 
> In february we had a follow up meeting with sponsors of action plans and 
> leadership teams (and a few more - it was an open invitation). I use a method 
> to let the people evaluate effects from development work (mostly OST as part 
> of it) and they came up with a lot both related to the action plans and other 
> behaviors/actions and organizational benefits. I use the framework from 
> Kirkpatricks four levels (1. Experience. 2. Learning. 3. Transfer to 
> behaviors/actions. 4. Results/effects). So in the end of the OST they did 
> reflect/document in pairs on level 1,2 (actually in relation to the aspects 
> of the medicine wheel), this was further processed in the first follow up 
> meeting (after 2 weeks). Then in the 2nd follow up meeting where I took part 
> they had a dialogue and documented results on level 3,4.
> 
> I hope you manage to follow me, I tried to quickly cover some of the points 
> you raised - good process for me too (-:
> Cheers
> Thomas
> PS Just heard back from the leadership team - we go for it without 
> presentations on Friday and we will sharpen the invitation a bit. I am 
> longing already (-:
> DS
> 
> 26 aug 2014 kl. 03:40 skrev Michael Wood <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hi Thomas (and anyone else)
>> 
>> I would be very interested to hear a bit more, Thomas Herman,  about what 
>> you are learning about using Open Space in a hospital context. 
>> 
>> In particular, what the convening question/theme was for the original Open 
>> Space, how much time was given to it,  and how action teams emerging from 
>> the 'big' Open Space have functioned, and/or were formally 'resourced' or 
>> 'authorised' by the Hospital Administration after the OST meeting? 
>> 
>> The 'story' I hear from my hospital contacts here is 'not enough time to 
>> open space'. Assuming that all hospitals around the world are probably 
>> overstretched, I'm curious what precipitated the decision to formally 'open 
>> space' last year and how the internal administration decided that they just 
>> had to give it the time they did? 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Michael Wood
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> Tomorrow I will facilitate an OST with a hospital that is becoming deeply 
>>> engaged in the use of OST and keeping it alive in ordinary life of the 
>>> organization. 
>>> My sponsor wants the action teams (maybe around 10) from last years big OST 
>>> to give a brief report back (I often use a method for maximum 1 mts/person 
>>> in situations like this) and that is all fine. We had originally planned it 
>>> in the foyer with morning coffee as an informal arrival activity. Now we 
>>> discovered that it will be very difficult to hear there as there are no 
>>> microphones available there, so we will have this presentation in the main 
>>> room (and have coffee there too). I am thinking about seating these people 
>>> in a inner circle inside the two big ones (it's an OST for 100 persons) and 
>>> let them share to each other using the microphone. Otherwise there is also 
>>> a stage at the one side of the room.
>>> 
>>> Any suggestions, experiences and/or ideas welcome. 
>>> Good night &
>>> Cheers
>>> Thomas Herrmann
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSList mailing list
>> To post send emails to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to