Curious about the question on the numbers who return for the closing circle. 
Depends on context and the need for a consensus or shared understanding around 
what is next, I suppose. Without a need for folks to return, I tend not to 
worry about it.

My favorite story was OS as the second day of a four day annual network 
conference. (Big mistake - not the final day.) Morning dawned with several 
inches of fresh powder snow visible from the ballroom picture window. I made a 
joke about the law of two skis. 380 people started and 125 returned that 
evening. But of them, 90% were very satisfied with the day. Something told me 
that the butterflies on the lifts also had the conversations they needed.

Jeff

-------- Original message --------
From: Alan Stewart via OSList <[email protected]> 
Date:01/29/2015  4:43 PM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: Leslie Zucker <[email protected]>,World wide Open Space Technology 
email list <[email protected]>,Catherine Pfaehler 
<[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [OSList] Leslie's questions 

Dear Catherine, Leslie and All

These are the most insightful and practical ideas on how all participants in a 
short duration OST gathering can obtain the most value from the experience. 

I congratulate and salute you. 

Go well

Alan 


Alan Stewart, PhD
Social Artist
Facilitator of conversations that matter and participatory fun
Based in Adelaide and operating throughout Austral-Asia
Em: [email protected]
Web: www.multimindsolutions.com
Mob: +61413848680 
Blog: Conversare
Tw: @alpalstewart


"If there's dancing count me in"





On 30 January 2015 at 09:43, Leslie Zucker via OSList 
<[email protected]> wrote:
Catherine, 
Thanks so very much for your thoughtful response, I really appreciate your 
time. I still find it amazing, after all these years how caring and helpful 
people on this list are. 

Your wording for the book of proceedings is great. Go right ahead.
I did end up including a lot of context about the event in the Book of 
Proceedings which I just sent out last night to both the people who came and 
who registered but did not show up.  I am also scheduling “debrief” meetings 
with people who said they are vested in the outcomes (funders) but didn’t show 
up to the event itself. Any words of wisdom about talking about the value of 
the event to funders who didn’t come?  My guess is that they will want to know 
what are the top three action items from the event?  The truth is there aren’t 
any action items, per se, but there was value - community building as the 
strongest one, for sure. 

I provide a form for note-taking (see annex), in which I include „the most 
important outcomes in three sentences“ for the closing circle, especially for 
Open Space Events that are as short as yours or no longer than a day.
I agree with you that it’s helpful to use a template for the note taking.  I 
did provide one at my event but it didn’t ask for the most important outcomes 
in three sentences for the closing circle. Nonetheless, only half the groups 
turned in any notes.  I will try it the way you suggest next time! 

However, it is of utmost importance to ask for „the 3 sentences only“ when you 
open the closing circle, as coming back to listening mode after all those vivid 
discussions is difficult and often creates a sudden drop of energy. 

I couldn’t agree with you more about this! I definitely felt the sudden drop of 
energy in the closing circle and found it (frankly) quite difficult to sit 
through.   Although I had suggested concise comments or 1-2 minutes maximum/ 
per person and focused on any one of the three questions that I prepped them 
for (meaning in the opening circle, I told them we’d discuss those three 
questions in the closing circle). The questions were these: 1) What did you 
learn or contribute? 2) What surprised you? and 3) What did you like about this 
process?  That suggestion was clearly not what people wanted to do. Instead, 
they introduced themselves, what their organization does and offers, 
performances that are coming up, etc. Even as the facilitator, I felt trapped 
and unable to exercise the Law of Two Feet. On two occasions, I tried to guide 
the comments back to the three questions, but that only worked with a few 
people, not the majority.  Finally, I just let it be what it was going to be. 
Unfortunately, however, it did mean that the ending was anti-climactic, when I 
really believe that a strong feeling of unity, connection and gratitude is a 
more powerful way to end an Open Space. 

I wonder what I could have done differently?   Suggestions, questions, ideas 
are welcome! 

Touching on another question - how do you or others successfully fill the 
closing circle with just as many people as the opening circle? Suggestions are 
also welcome for this. 

Many, many, many thanks in advance! 


Leslie Zucker
Trainer, Facilitator and Life Coach for Life's Dancers
+1 (202) 425 7637
[email protected]
www.lesliezucker.com



On Jan 28, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Catherine Pfaehler <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Leslie
 
Your wording for the book of proceedings is great. Go right ahead.
 
I provide a form for note-taking (see annex), in which I include „the most 
important outcomes in three sentences“ for the closing circle, especially for 
Open Space Events that are as short as yours or no longer than a day. In such 
short events, the sponsor often decides not to copy the book of proceedings for 
everybody, so I merely produce a small documentation, i.e. a list with all the 
topics, the conveners, and these three sentences, plus the OS principles and 
the list with all the participants for everyone to take home. 
When I finish my introduction, I say „We meet again for the closing circle at … 
o’clock – this will be harvest time and for many the most beautiful and richest 
moments of the day. Every group will report back their most important outcomes 
and we will share our most important experiences - don’t miss it! And now, the 
day (or evening) is yours, enjoy it!“
The first part of this closing circle then are the reports, and this is the 
time when they find the small documentation on their seats. The above 
announcement often helps for people to stay longer. However, it is of utmost 
importance to ask for „the 3 sentences only“ when you open the closing circle, 
as coming back to listening mode after all those vivid discussions is difficult 
and often creates a sudden drop of energy. This report back to the plenary 
contributes to the feeling of ownership of the results with the participants, 
especially without a book of proceedings. 
 
Usually in the second part of the closing circle, when the talking stick goes 
around and people reflect on their experience in Open Space, very profound 
insights and most touching experiences are shared. For me, the Open Space event 
is never over before the closing circle has finished. Be prepared to be 
surprised…
 
Have fun! Best, Catherine
 
Catherine Pfaehler
Open Space Begleitung
Burckhardtstrasse 2
CH - 3008 Bern
Switzerland
+41-(0)31-536 05 31
www.open-space-begleitung.ch
 
<Notes taker form.doc><Notes taker form, page 2.doc>


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to