I think God will be happy! Always good to give credit where credit is due.
ho From: Daniel Mezick [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:33 AM To: World wide Open Space Technology email list Cc: Harrison Owen Subject: Re: [OSList] open message to Nick Martin Greetings to All, I am very happy that Open Space Technology is now published under a truly open-source license. What this means in practical terms is that anyone can derive from OST and even commercialize that derivation, so long as two very important conditions are met: 1. The derived work is **also** published and made freely available, free to the world, under that same CC-BY-SA (truly open-source) license, and 2. The person creating the new work provides very clear and distinct attribution back to the source, in this case clearly referring-back to the link to the open-source OST Reference Definition and license per the terms of that license: <http://osius.org/ost-reference-definition> http://osius.org/ost-reference-definition You may wonder where I stand on open source licensing. Or, maybe not. Probably not! But, just for the record, here is where I stand on open-source licensing for social technologies like OST: Protocols for interactions, frameworks for organizing teams, and meeting designs are inherently social technologies. Social technologies have the potential to advance the progress and functioning of teams, communities and the wider society at large. Social technology can improve organizations, communities and even civilization itself. For social technologies to rapidly advance human progress, they must be published in a way that allows for their free derivation, innovation and combination. The open source licensing of social technology allows this, and thereby encourages genuine and lasting human progress. Social technologies such as interaction protocols, organizing frameworks, and meeting designs carry with them the great potential to improve human conditions. Human progress is impeded when promising social technologies are closed to derivation and commercialization into new, innovative and useful forms, combinations and designs. Innovation and human progress is encouraged when social technologies are published in an open way, under a true open source license. The publication of promising social technology under open-to-innovate licensing arrangements represents a very large opportunity to rapidly accelerate human progress. In light of the foregoing, I plan to immediately incorporate a reference to open-source OST into my own designs, to get aligned 100% with this. I have developed some social technology that builds upon and in fact derives from Open Space Technology. Here they are: 1. http://www.Prime-OS.com: PRIME/OS, an Engagement Model. Prime/OS is published open-source. 2. http://www.OpenSpaceAgility.com: OPENSPACE AGILITY is also open-source because it based on and refers to open-source Prime/OS. OpenSpace Agility is published open-source per the terms of the Prime-OS license. What I plan to do in light of this OST Reference Definition is the following: 1. Update the Prime/OS Reference Definition so that it derives from the OST Reference Definition on the proper way. I also plan to add the link from OSI-US to the definition of Prime/OS, and make it clear that Prime/OS is using OST and is based upon it. And that Prime/OS ***derives from** OST. REFERENCE LINKS: Here are some reference links for those who want to dig deeper on this subject of open licensing: Freedom Defined: https://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/CC-BY-SA Link to the CC-BY-SA license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Link to Prime/OS Reference Definition (I plan to update this document soon): https://openspaceagility.com/prime/download-prime/ So, there you go, I am happy that OST is published under an open source license, and I hope anyone and everyone with some kind of derivation of Open Space Technology refers back to this license and publishes their derivations open and free. This is a big deal ! I hope you find all of this interesting. Have a nice day! -Daniel Daniel Mezick Phone: 203 915 7248 Bio & Contact Info: http://www.DanielMezick.com Latest Book: http://www.InvitingLeadership.com Business Agility Leadership event May 14-15 Boston: The Open Leadership Symposium <https://openleadershipnetwork.com> On Jun 9, 2019, at 5:51 PM, Harrison Owen via OSList <[email protected]> wrote: Well said! Harrison From: OSList [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Owen via OSList Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2019 7:41 AM To: World wide Open Space Technology email list Cc: Barry Owen Subject: Re: [OSList] open message to Nick Martin Harold - What you wrote is great. Thank you! Bhavish, I could copy and paste your comments @ Massacre of Open Space and send them to a group that does an annual event here in Nashville. This event began with me doing an Open Space event. I invited REALTORS to come together to talk about issues and opportunities we were facing as a direct result of the Economic Downward Spiral in 2008 which was devastating for many. Because this topic also affected all of the "Service Support" people we rely on during transactions (Lenders, Title Companies, Contractors, Inspectors, & etc), I invited them to come as sponsors. 24 of these sponsors paid $150 each for a table to display information about their business. This money paid all of the overhead, so the event was free for the REALTORS. I arranged these tables in a concentric circle around the Main Circle and invited the sponsors to attend as participants. This was an Open Space meeting about a very important issue with people from every conceivable Real Estate related business - 300 REALTORS attended, and the event was a huge success. The following year, I was queueing up a "2nd Annual" event when I was approached by a group of people who had the backing of the REALTOR Association. Based on the success of the event I facilitated, they decided to do it using BarCamp - NashvilleREBarcamp and scheduled their event to conflict with mine. They asked me join forces with them rather than having 2 different events. With reservation, I agreed, and the event was also a huge success (Although not Open Space) - 500 Participants - More "Traditional" arrangement for sponsors who paid more money to sponsor breakout spaces and were not, under any circumstances, allowed to do any promotion beyond their name on the breakout space. Over the past 10 years, that event has grown and morphed into what you describe . . . and even worse. The 10th Annual was a couple months ago - Over 700 REALTORS registered . . . There were @ 30 "Experts" who flew in from all over the country to "teach" sessions. There were @ 35 sessions (I did one about "Operating a Brokerage in Open Space"). All of the sessions were scheduled before the doors opened. I was disappointed because I thought it could have been way better in Open Space Technology, but . . . I decided it was better than nothing :-) As I went through the day, I noticed that, even though OST wasn't the process for the meeting . . . Open Space happened for many of the participants. My general observation is that Open Space happens at some level every time any group gathers . . . Having the meeting using OST simply increases the impact for more of the participants. So . . . Harrison Owen's mantra of "Just Open more Space" is happening every day as each of us is out there engaging important and complex issues and opportunities . . . even when it doesn't look like OST. On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 3:58 PM Harold Shinsato via OSList < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> wrote: Very interesting conversation and attempts to describe OST! I'm reading Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book, Anti-Fragile. It seems to me Open Space is antifragile. The idea of antifragility goes beyond resilience. Life in general is antifragile. It doesn't just bounce back from set-backs. It actually gets stronger as it overcomes challenges and stress. Antifragility seems relevant in this conversation as it seems the more people try to document or describe Open Space, even with rather challenging inaccuracies, the stronger it gets. I like Liberating Structures. The 'min-specs' for OST seem accurate in the book and the website, even if it leaves out how much more powerful it gets in the "long form" (or at least more than 90 minutes). And it leaves out the need to get strong authorization from leaders. I love that it says it's not open space without the law of two feet. But the Liberating Structures 'min-specs' don't emphasize the importance of not generating topics ahead of time. I've unfortunately encountered rather large events claiming to be 'open space' where the participants either generated the topics in advance, or worse, didn't even get to generate the topics. The "Open Space" with-a-twist as described on <https://workshopbank.com/open-space-technology> https://workshopbank.com/open-space-technology shows a nice picture and I hope it introduces more folks to Open Space Technology. For me at least, doing the agenda creation before the OST is an unconference trick, but it hugely diminishes the potential power of OST. For what it is worth - Harrison Owen may not have claimed any ownership rights of Open Space, but what he did do is ask us to share back what we learn as we practice Open Space. That should start by honoring and sharing our sources. Another way to reference back is a project the Open Space Institute U.S. did a several years ago with Harrison Owen's help. "Open Space Technology: The Reference Definition" which is Creative Commons Share and Adapt (cc by-sa) licensed. So feel free to reference it as you share-and-extend. Twisty or Straight! <http://osius.org/ost-reference-definition> http://osius.org/ost-reference-definition Regards, Harold On 6/5/19 8:10 AM, Robin Muretisch, Facilitative Insights, LLC via OSList wrote: For everyone, the Liberating Structures site has a handy “min specs” description of OST. Here’s the link: <http://www.liberatingstructures.com/25-open-space-technology/> http://www.liberatingstructures.com/25-open-space-technology/. Regards, Robin Robin D. H. Muretisch, CPF, MBA, CPA IAF Certified™ Professional Facilitator <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] | 770.371.5874 | <https://www.linkedin.com/in/robin-muretisch/> <image001.jpg> <http://www.facinsights.com/> <image002.jpg> From: OSList <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Nick Martin via OSList Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 2:33 AM To: Marai Kiele <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; ost list international <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Cc: Nick Martin <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSList] open message to Nick Martin Thanks for your open letter Marai. I'm always excited and willing to receive feedback. As you'll remember over a year ago I opened up the content of this article for comments and input from this list in the form of a Google Doc. Such was the passion exhibited in the original thread I was eager and excited to receive your inputs. Unfortunately only two people replied though. I'm very grateful to both you and Keith Blundell for taking the time. I must admit life took over and in my wait for more input other priorities took over. I'm happy to revisit it now though as I can feel the energy is back and I'd like to the right thing in the eyes of this excellent community. Here's the link - <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ufIsy0BQvIqlRUbW0FAyXHGV0IKw3VdDT8L91RIJJU8/edit?usp=sharing> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ufIsy0BQvIqlRUbW0FAyXHGV0IKw3VdDT8L91RIJJU8/edit?usp=sharing Please add your thoughts, comments and feedback and amend the article as best I can. photo <https://s3.amazonaws.com/ucwebapp.wisestamp.com/1beb5b49-273b-467b-9f5d-1a1493f4184a/NickMartin_HighRes.format_png.resize_200x.jpeg> Nick Martin Founder & CEO,WorkshopBank M <tel:+45%2042%2047%2000%2074> +45 42 47 00 74 E <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] W <http://workshopbank.com/> workshopbank.com <http://facebook.com/workshopbank> <http://dk.linkedin.com/in/nickmartn> <http://twitter.com/workshopbank> On 05/06/2019 01:53, Marai Kiele wrote: Hello Nick Martin, I find myself tense in my belly after reading your newsletter today: I just wanted to share with you <https://t.dripemail2.com/c/eyJhY2NvdW50X2lkIjoiMjM3MTU2MiIsImRlbGl2ZXJ5X2lkIjoiNjc1OTQzNzE4MiIsInVybCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd29ya3Nob3BiYW5rLmNvbS9vcGVuLXNwYWNlLXRlY2hub2xvZ3k_dXRtX3NvdXJjZT1kcmlwXHUwMDI2dXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbFx1MDAyNnV0bV9jYW1wYWlnbj1uZXctdG9vbC1vcGVuLXNwYWNlXHUwMDI2X19zPXFtZXdvcGZiZnpzMnBvY3ltZTRnIn0> a popular WorkshopBank tool you can start using with your clients right away. Let me know what you think. You suggest that the reader lets you know what they think. I choose to do that. I also choose to do that in the form of an open letter, as several months back you asked on the os-list for input to your description of the OST process for the Workshopbank. You introduced your version of „OST with a twist“, and there was a somewhat heated discussion on this list about it. I participated in both, revising and giving you feedback on your description (as requested) and discussing about „is something with such a twist still OST?“ Your twist was about giving the leaders control about the topics. Back then I used the analogy that you are mixing red wine with coca cola (which some people actually do and drink — I tried it out as a teenager). And that calling such a beverage „red wine with a twist“ is an inaccurate representation of a) red wine and b) the taste that a consumer will experience. (side note: usually, this mix is done with red wine of poor quality) In my analogy, OST is the red wine and controlling the process is the coke. In your description, you early on distinguish between OST and OST with a twist. I first appreciated you for making that distinction so upfront. Then I read what you wrote under: If you’re following the traditional Open Space Process... * 1 Gather your participants together and briefly explain how Open Space events work using Harrison Owen’s 1 Law and the Guiding Principles as appropriate. Traditionally you should do this with everyone in a circle around you but you don’t necessarily have to. * 2 Ask participants to spend 10 minutes thinking through if they have any issues they’d like to raise. * 3 If there is a general agreement that the issue has enough support and passion behind it invite the issue owner to add the issue to the schedule. * 4 Once all issues have been added invite the participants to sign-up for the sessions they’re planning on attending (they are free to change their mind later if they want to). * 5 Your sessions start. There is much more on this page that, as I see it, is NOT "the traditional Open Space Process“. I am giving just some further examples: <https://workshopbank.com/open-space-technology> https://workshopbank.com/open-space-technology Process for a Session * 1 Each session should be a round group of chairs (no table in the middle) with preferably one facilitator to lead the discussion and a scribe on the flip-chart. * 2 A session starts with the issue owner welcoming and thanking the group for coming and then giving a description of the issue as they see it. * 3 The facilitator then leads the discussion inviting people to give their input at their request. * 4 The scribe records the discussion on flip chart paper making sure to mark Issues, Ideas, Questions (that can’t be answered today) & Actions. When a flip is finished they should tear it off and put it in the center of the circle or on a nearby wall for people in the group to see. * 5 Allow people to leave and arrive as they see fit though don’t allow them to interrupt or slow-down your progress. It is a new arrival’s responsibility to catch-up with the discussion using the flip chart outputs no matter how high up or important they are. * 6 When the issue looks like it has been covered and there are no more inputs coming from your group thank them for their time and invite them to join other groups if the session time is not over. To me, calling this description "the traditional Open Space Process“ I wonder if - I am totally rigid and should just loosen up to the variations of OST - You have never experienced a traditional Open Space Process - You just don’t care about the originality and instead rather cater to business needs of controlled processes that limit self-organisation - I misremember all my trainings with Harrison Owen, Michael M Pannwitz, Michael Pannwitz jr, Joe Töpfer, and last but not least Birgitt Williams. - or… ? I totally don’t get it. I don’t like what you are doing. I also dislike that you market this description of „the traditional Open Space Process“ as „a popular WorkshopBank Tool“. I feel sad when I imagine people following your description and spreading the word that „this is the traditional way of doing OST“. Using my former analogy: I imagine what you are doing is like a beverage shop introducing someone who has never tasted a good red wine to that beverage. Because this person usually drink coke, they are being given red wine mixed with coke (to match their taste buds). And then they are being told, „this is a traditional Cabernet Sauvignon“. I want you to revise your description and move your adaptions away from "the original version" to „OST with a twist“. Are you willing to do that? Probably even better: Call it „…………….. - a process partly inspired by Open Space Technology“ I look forward to your response, Marai <https://www.linkedin.com/in/marai-kiele/> https://www.linkedin.com/in/marai-kiele/ <https://about.me/maraikiele> https://about.me/maraikiele _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] -- Harold Shinsato <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <http://shinsato.com/> http://shinsato.com twitter: <http://twitter.com/hajush> @hajush _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] -- Barry Owen Inviter - Facilitator/Practicer of Open Space Technology Opening and Holding safe space for people and organizations to self-organize around important issues and opportunities. Invite - Listen - Love 615-568-2123 <http://barryowen.us/> BarryOwen.us 4004 Hillsboro Pike B234 Nashville, TN 37215 _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
