<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-93p7mh5Ha2k/WYDNh4KF9bI/AAAAAAAABGw/VyNLonSjstkqLFqcTA44h5en2INWOZ9MQCLcBGAs/s1600/stourbridge%2Broad%2Bisland%2Brouting.jpg> I hope this doesn't cause a barrage....
For years I have not been able to fix the underlying OSM maps to stop this happening: <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-93p7mh5Ha2k/WYDNh4KF9bI/AAAAAAAABGw/VyNLonSjstkqLFqcTA44h5en2INWOZ9MQCLcBGAs/s1600/stourbridge%2Broad%2Bisland%2Brouting.jpg> So I can drive across the traffic roundabout, walk it, but to cycle it I must go 7.76 km! I have tried to edit the OSM, but I'm clearly not having success. Yes, the stourbridge road is a bicycle-unfriendly dual carriageway, but no less unfriendly for walkers. Thanks On Sunday, 30 July 2017 12:22:59 UTC+1, Thomas Köller wrote: > > When using Osmand for car navigation, the routing decisions are sometimes > suboptimum, or just plain silly, as in the attached example. I came across > this during my vacation in Scandinavia. As can be seen, both start and end > point are on the same major road, the E14. The route computed by Osmand > using an offline map (map file for Sweden, dated June 1st, 2017), instead > of just following the E14 as would be appropriate, needlessly diverts from > that road onto a minor one leading through a village, later to rejoin the > E14. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
