On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Poutnik <[email protected]> wrote: > Does it mean car-eco gives you the route you prefer more, > even if you prefer the fastest route ?
Hum... lets see if I am properly using (and understanding) how BRouter works :-) After running it, I map the "car-eco" profile to "motorcar_short" and "car-fast" to "motorcar_fast", for example. In osmand if I select the fastest option I imagine that it will use motorcar_fast from brouter, while if I select the economic route it will use motorcar_short. Is that right? Most of the places that I travel have a maxspeed of 100 km/h (with an average speed of around 90 km/h) And maybe I am not a good example: I usually prefer some routes that go through smaller places. For example, here: https://umap.openstreetmap.co/en/map/untitled-map_1253#9/-22.2586/-49.7873 Tracing routes from the green pin to the red pin, I get: With car-fast (in red color) distance 426 km with an estimated travel time of 7h 43 min With car-eco (in green color) it says that the distance is 405 km with an estimated travel time of 7h 20 min With Car-FastEco-NoUnpaved (in blue color) it says that the distance is 408 km and time of 7h 24 min The calculated time are off by +2 hours it seems. The car-fast (red) would be my last choice: while it calculates a route with more motorways, it also has more tolls. car-eco (green) is good for me, but I would choose Car-FastEco-NoUnpaved in this specific example (blue) But in general, and for my personal taste, both car-eco and Car-FastEco-NoUnpaved would be fine to be the default profile for my routes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
