On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 8:30:39 PM UTC+2, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > > In osmand if I select the fastest option I imagine that it will use > motorcar_fast from brouter, while if I select the economic route it > will use motorcar_short. Is that right? >
yes > Most of the places that I travel have a maxspeed of 100 km/h (with an > average speed of around 90 km/h) > And maybe I am not a good example: I usually prefer some routes that > go through smaller places. > > car-fast and car-eco are identical except for a single parameter: "vmax" This is the nominal speed you want to go, and that also defines the factor at which you are willing to trade time-time for energy (=fuel). This same factor is also used for routing decisions between longer, but fast roads and shorter, but slow roads. It's set to 90 kmh for "eco" and to 160 kmh for "fast", and if you really want to see "small places", just put a low number there. The calculated time are off by +2 hours it seems. > Travel times from BRouter are not (yet) interfaces with OsmAnd. What you see is an OsmAnd internal estimate based on constant (low) speed. You see BRouter's travel times in the comment-header of generated GPX tracks, or in BRouter-Web: http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#zoom=8&lat=-22.384&lon=-50.513&layer=OpenStreetMap&lonlats=-48.193524,-21.802739|-51.416874,-22.119358&nogos=&profile=car-eco&alternativeidx=0&format=geojson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
