Dne čtvrtek 14. února 2019 15:50:27 UTC+1 Paul Johnson napsal(a): > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019, 03:45 JeCh <[email protected] <javascript:> > wrote: > >> Osmand is perfect for bike and walking, can serve also in a car for very >> short distances. But it doesn't make much sense to use it as a regular car >> navigation. There are much better navigation apps. >> > > I dunno about better. Certainly faster. But it is possible and I have > used Osmand on transcontinental trips before. >
I didn't say can't use Osmand for long car trips. You can, but there are plenty of better options to do that. > If you can use data, there is nothing better then Waze. It doesn't make >> sense to think about anything else. >> > > Unless you live someolace that isn't one of the top 10 largest US cities, > then Google Waze doesn't give a shit about you. > I certainly don't live in a big city. I even don't live in the USA. But I use Waze daily because it reliably tells me which way to choose based on current traffic situation. Nobody else has better information about car speeds and traffic density then Google/Waze. Yes, it would be perfect if we had a free and open data source for traffic and road speeds (both average and current). Unfortunately there is nothing available. In this case I take the best I can and this is Waze. Just check https://www.waze.com/cs/livemap and you can see how wrong you are. The traffic information is available almost everywhere, if you have a good mobile connection. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
