I started out thinking your suggestion was the best approach. And if the track is straightforward enough between the starting point and the destination, it is indeed the best approach.
But the tracks I've seen posted online are mostly scenic routes, some of looping back to where they started, and consequently they require a lot of points to duplicate. (The routing algorithm can be very insistent.) Moreover, OsmAnd will navigate to each point you put down, treating each as if it were a turn. So as a universal solution, I think it's better to use the GPX itself. On Thursday, February 21, 2019 at 4:38:09 PM UTC-8, Metaluc wrote: > > I watched your video on YouTube. I was expecting that you would use the > GPX file as a visual guide to add several map "route shaping" points, then > turn off the track and calculate a route using the map. > > This would work if you had enough points, wouldn't it? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
