On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 04:10:12PM -0700, Bart Eisenberg wrote:
On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 1:58:03 PM UTC-7, Xavier wrote:
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Bart Eisenberg wrote:
>Thanks! Did "access:disabled
><https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>=*" ever get beyond a
>proposed feature on OSM?
Given the extensive documentation and 7.3M usage indicated here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
I'd say the answer is likely to be "yes".
>Is there a way to tell how widely used the tag is? There's also
>"disabled=*" but its use is minimal.
Taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=access%3Adisabled)
Indicates 2,610 uses, so not a lot of usage.
Not much usage indeed. So I guess the answer to the original question
is--even if OsmAnd supported the tag, there's not enough data to be
useful.
Not yet at least. But if OsmAnd did support the tag, might that give
some incentive towards maybe expanding the usage?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/20190603014804.GL1375%40d820.dp100.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
