Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> writes: > Private Property is not "access=private" - Thats for Germany > "Privatweg". Its just a notification of different ownership.
agreed. > If there is an extension with "No thru traffic" thats destination not > private. agreed. > Even "No trespassing" may be interpreted as "permissive" as access is > not prohibited per se but depends on your relation to other legal > entities. In the US, marking a place signed "no trespassing" as "permissive" is outright crazy. Indeed, if one has permission, then the no trepassing sign doesn't apply to them. But this is *exactly* the definition of access=private. > So one needs to exactly read the signs and not make anything looking a > bit privatish to access=private. True, but one also needs to be careful not to mark things that are actually private as something else because of a dislike of private. That is putting intentionally bad data into OSM. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/rmimu7mm0d7.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
