Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document

Tue, 10 May 2011 09:23:02 -0700

Alvaro,

I did some more thinking and can summarize our disagreement as follows:  I think we should agree on a single method for single-hop broadcast interfaces, and you think the method should depend on whether or not the network also contains MANET interfaces.  Even if the network contains MANET interfaces, I am not sure that treating a single-hop broadcast interface as a modified/simplified MANET interface makes things much easier, compared to using a somewhat similar solution (hybrid-bcast-p2mp) that is a simple modification of OSPF.  I don't think either of us is wrong.  Just different opinions.

Richard


Retana, Alvaro wrote:

Hi!

 

Following up on the WG meeting in Prague…

 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-retana-ospf-manet-single-hop

 

A brief poll at the meeting found no objection to this update to rfc 5820.

 

This e-mail is the formal request for adoption as a WG document.  Just like rfc 5820, the intended status is Experimental.

 

Thoughts/comments?

 

Thanks!

 

Alvaro.

 


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
  



_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to