Richard, Don't you think you are being a bit presumptuous? I think this decision is the prerogative of the working group and I don't necessarily think 'fairness' has anything to do with it. Further, having multiple drafts in a given subject area is generally considered a bad idea.
Thanks, John Sent from my iPhone > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Richard Ogier > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG > Document > > Note that I plan to submit an analogous draft that describes how > OSPF-MDR (RFC 5614) can be applied to single-hop broadcast networks. > If > draft-retana-ospf-manet-single-hop is accepted as a WG document, then > it > would also be fair to accept the analogous draft for OSPF-MDR as a WG > document. > > Regards, > Richard > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
