Acee
Do you think that anyone will be seriously confused
or make an implementation error over this?
This looks like an erratum that should be verified
as correct (because it is), but set aside for fixing
in the next release - i.e. the doc should not
instruct the reader to go to the errata page to
understand the doc.
Stewart
On 28/09/2011 16:37, Acee Lindem wrote:
Steward, Adrian,
Approved for state change to verified. This is something I'm going to add to my
list of things to check (especially in Bis documents).
Thanks,
Acee
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:34 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250,
"The OSPF Opaque LSA Option".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2981
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Gary Cote<[email protected]>
Section: 3
Original Text
-------------
Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
Corrected Text
--------------
Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
Notes
-----
Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370.
IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document.
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05)
--------------------------------------
Title : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
Publication Date : July 2008
Author(s) : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
