Hi Stewart, On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Acee > > Do you think that anyone will be seriously confused > or make an implementation error over this? No. > > This looks like an erratum that should be verified > as correct (because it is), but set aside for fixing > in the next release - i.e. the doc should not > instruct the reader to go to the errata page to > understand the doc. Agreed. This would apply to both Errata. Thanks, Acee > > Stewart > > > On 28/09/2011 16:37, Acee Lindem wrote: >> Steward, Adrian, >> Approved for state change to verified. This is something I'm going to add to >> my list of things to check (especially in Bis documents). >> Thanks, >> Acee >> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:34 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >> >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250, >>> "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option". >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2981 >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Editorial >>> Reported by: Gary Cote<[email protected]> >>> >>> Section: 3 >>> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment. >>> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment. >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370. >>> IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document. >>> >>> Instructions: >>> ------------- >>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05) >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Title : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option >>> Publication Date : July 2008 >>> Author(s) : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun >>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>> Area : Routing >>> Stream : IETF >>> Verifying Party : IESG >> > > > -- > For corporate legal information go to: > > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
