Hi Acee, I have read through the draft. I support it as a WG document now. Some authors from this draft cooperated with us in doing the framework document and sorting out the overlap work. I just want to inform people who are interest in this topic also notice the work in MPLS WG. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-02
Best Regards, Xihua Fu Acee Lindem <[email protected]> 发件人: [email protected] 2011-10-05 05:45 收件人 OSPF List <[email protected]> 抄送 主题 [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) We've discussed this draft at the last two IETFs and there seemed to be interest. We believe we sorted out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and CCAMP WGs and are now ready to accept it as a WG document. Does anyone have any objections? Here is a link to the current draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02.txt Thanks, Acee and Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
