Hi Spencer, I think we have discussed this within ourselves earlier, but I was wondering if you saw most of the loss on a link or on the device itself?
Thanks, Vishwas On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>wrote: > We've discussed this draft at the last two IETFs and there seemed to be > interest. We believe we sorted out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and > CCAMP WGs and are now ready to accept it as a WG document. > Does anyone have any objections? > > Here is a link to the current draft: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02.txt > > Thanks, > Acee and Abhay > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
