RFC-Editor(s), Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? Thanks, Acee On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember > giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant > we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of pointing > to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? > > There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. > > Cheers, Manav > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >> >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <[email protected]> >> >> Section: 3. >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now >> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it >> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. >> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, >> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be >> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the >> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and >> edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >> Publication Date : October 2009 >> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. >> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >> Area : Routing >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
