Hi Alice, Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter quickly, I have opened a tools ticket on this issue:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6 Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to do it (WG chairs don't have the authority). Thanks, Acee On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote: > Acee, Manav, > > The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709) are created and maintained by the Tools > Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by running rfcmarkup > (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text of the RFC. In short, > the link on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was automatically created > based on parsing the string "RFC 2328, Appendix D". > > As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the RFCs as > available from rfc-editor.org, e.g., > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt. > > The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents of the > errata report. Perhaps the Corrected Text could convey the intended > correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D, as updated by > this document)", and the content of the Notes could be removed. > > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ah > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > >> RFC-Editor(s), >> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? >> Thanks, >> Acee >> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: >> >>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember >>> giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant >>> we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of >>> pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? >>> >>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC. >>> >>> Cheers, Manav >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); [email protected]; >>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; >>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; >>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; >>>> [email protected]; [email protected] >>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >>>> >>>> >>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> You may review the report below and at: >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989 >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Type: Editorial >>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Section: 3. >>>> >>>> Original Text >>>> ------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>> >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>> >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now >>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it >>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. >>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >>>> >>>> Instructions: >>>> ------------- >>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, >>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be >>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the >>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and >>>> edit the report, if necessary. >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >>>> Publication Date : October 2009 >>>> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. >>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>>> Area : Routing >>>> Stream : IETF >>>> Verifying Party : IESG >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
