The OSPF WG last call has ended and the 05 version addresses comments. Thanks, Acee On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> All, > This version addresses Vladica's and Paul's comments as well as specifying > the details for IANA OSPF Instance ID allocation. Please base your OSPF WG > last call review on this version. > > Thanks, > Acee > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: September 20, 2011 9:22:22 PM EDT > To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, > "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.txt > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.txt has been > successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance > Revision: 05 > Title: OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions > Creation date: 2011-09-20 > WG ID: ospf > Number of pages: 13 > > Abstract: > OSPFv3 includes a mechanism for supporting multiple instances on the > same link. OSPFv2 could benefit from such a mechanism in order to > support multiple routing domains on the same subnet. The OSPFv2 > instance ID is reserved for support of separate OSPFv2 protocol > instances. This is different from OSPFv3 where it could be used for > other purposes such as putting the same link in multiple areas. > OSPFv2 supports this capability using a separate subnet or the OSPF > multi-area adjacency capability. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
