Dear Acee, We can add one statement in section 3 of this draft [which is for OSPFv3] "LA-bit prefix we advertise in intra area prefix LSA for Virtual LINK IPv6 address discovery, must not be taken from the interface where the prefix hiding is configured"
Please check. Thanks & Regards Rajesh -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:37 PM Cc: OSPF List Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt> As I have heard no objections, I'm beginning the 2 week OSPF Working Group last call for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt. Please review the draft and post your last call comments prior to 12:00 AM PDT on February 23nd, 2012. Here is a URL for your convenience: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt Thanks, Acee On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > As WG co-chair, I have reviewed this document and believe it is ready for OSPF WG last call. Any other opinions? > There is at least one implementation. Here is a URL for you convenience: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-01.txt > > There is an IPR disclosure on this draft: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1423/ > > I will start WG last call next week if I don't hear any objections. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
