Dear Acee, Some more thoughts.
1) In section 3 of this draft " Hiding IPv6 Transit-only Networks in OSPFv3" We can also mention about LINK LSA. If the prefix hiding is configured on a interface, then no need to mention global prefixes in Link LSA. 2) For prefix hiding configuration option, may be we need to support OSPF and OSPFv3 MIBs as well. Thanks Rajesh -----Original Message----- From: Acee Lindem [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 7:49 PM To: Rajesh Cc: OSPF List Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt> Hi Rajesh, On Feb 20, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Rajesh wrote: > Dear Acee, > > We can add one statement in section 3 of this draft [which is for OSPFv3] > "LA-bit prefix we advertise in intra area prefix LSA for Virtual LINK IPv6 > address discovery, must not be taken from the interface where the prefix > hiding is configured" It is somewhat obvious that you wouldn't choose an address that is not advertised. However, I guess it wouldn't hurt to add that the RFC 5340, Section 4.4.3.9. Intra-Area-Prefix-LSAs, selection an IPv6 address to terminate virtual links will be modified to exclude interfaces with the prefix hiding configured. Thanks, Acee > > Please check. > > Thanks & Regards > Rajesh > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee > Lindem > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:37 PM > Cc: OSPF List > Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for "Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF > " - <draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt> > > As I have heard no objections, I'm beginning the 2 week OSPF Working Group > last call for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt. > Please review the draft and post your last call comments prior to 12:00 AM > PDT on February 23nd, 2012. > Here is a URL for your convenience: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt > > Thanks, > Acee > > On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > >> As WG co-chair, I have reviewed this document and believe it is ready for > OSPF WG last call. Any other opinions? >> There is at least one implementation. Here is a URL for you convenience: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-01.txt >> >> There is an IPR disclosure on this draft: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1423/ >> >> I will start WG last call next week if I don't hear any objections. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
