In response to Stewart Bryant's request, I looked at 
draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-02.txt for similarities. The only similarity is 
that both drafts use a random number for a unique router identifier. IMHO, this 
technique is obvious enough that there is no need to reference the expired ISIS 
draft.

I also received some off-list comments from Abhay Roy and Manav Bhatia 
regarding mitigation of the effects of duplicate router IDs in the OSPFv3 
routing domain prior to duplicate detection and resolution. I intend to address 
these in the next revision. At that time, we will ask for WG adoption.

Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to