On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > In response to Stewart Bryant's request, I looked at > draft-simpson-isis-ppp-unique-02.txt for similarities. The only similarity is > that both drafts use a random number for a unique router identifier. IMHO, > this technique is obvious enough that there is no need to reference the > expired ISIS draft.
In support of my supposition of obviousness, I Googled "unique system ID random number" and it yielded 21,800,000 results. Thanks, Acee > > I also received some off-list comments from Abhay Roy and Manav Bhatia > regarding mitigation of the effects of duplicate router IDs in the OSPFv3 > routing domain prior to duplicate detection and resolution. I intend to > address these in the next revision. At that time, we will ask for WG adoption. > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
