Hi Hannes, > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Gredler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 8:15 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: OSPF List; [email protected] list; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-01 > > > On Jun 12, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: > >> 5. The lack of MT-ID field in the SID/Label Binding TLV > >> > >> I had suggested to add an MT-ID field in the SID/Label Binding TLV and > Stefano had agreed to that suggestion. But it seems that the MT-ID field has > not > been added yet. > > > > > > I agree with you but since the binding TLV was not originally part of > > the SR proposal (i.e.: it's the merge with Hannes draft) I'd let > > Hannes to comment. > > > no concerns from my side, we can add a MTID subTLV to specify what topology > an advertised path does belong to.
That would be great. Best regards, Xiaohu > do you want to send text for the suggested change or shall i give a stab at > it ? > > /hannes _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
