> > If so, does it mean that the prefix-sid sub-TLV would not be used in the > > IPv6-SR > case? > > > not at this stage. > > In the future we may come back and revisit the idea of using 32bit SIDs for > ipv6 > as well.
Hi Stefano, What's the motivation for using 32-bit SIDs, rather than 20-bit MPLS labels for IPv6, especially when the GLOBAL MPLS label concept has been explicitly supported by the draft and encapsulating an MPLS label stack into an IPv6-based tunnel (e.g., MPLS-over-GRE) is a very mature technology? Best regards, Xiaohu _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
