Hi Peter, On 3 Sep 2014, at 09:13, Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> As per the above, I do not think that this mechanism replaces any >> capability, it just gives an operator a means to be more granular than the >> binary “supported”/“not supported” view that a flag indicating capabilities >> does. > > I understand. My point was that admin tags should not be used in cases where > only a binary capability is signaled. ACK, I completely agree. Perhaps we should add something into the draft that the admin-tag should not be used for such a purpose. Cheers, r. _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
