Hi Peter,
the draft lists about 5 different *example* applications which COULD be addressed by node admin tags. So if you take 1 particular possible scenario out of the draft - you still have 4 possible applications. Examples are there to demonstrate that admin tags is useful general tool, not to require the solution. Sure, each of possible scenarios can be solved by tailored solution. But each tailored solution is required to go via IETF adoption and implementation by vendors. And indeed, in cases where tailored solution brings so much operational benefit that it warrants slow path of IETF adoption, feature development by multiple vendors and network deployment - it will be used and will kill desire to solve the problem with admin tags. And vice verse - tags (when widely supported) will facilitate rapid development and deployment of services which we otherwise can't (or slow) to offer.


As for your particular example - operator still has to go to each and every device and enable Remote LFA on it. But we are not trying to solve this operational complexity with OSPF autoconfiguration. So it shouldn't be that complex to enable acceptable node tag at the same time as enabling rLFA itself.

Anton


On 08/26/2014 10:05 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
On 8/25/14 23:18 , Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
There are situations where node level policy is required and an OSPF
advertised admin tag simplifies this. For example, advertisement of
remote-LFA eligibility.

my concern with the generic use of admin tags for signaling capability
is that it's operationally unfriendly compared to explicit signaling of
the capability (e.g. using a bit or a TLV). The reason is that you have
to configure the tag meaning on all receiving routers.

thanks,
Peter


Please indicate your support or objections to adopting this draft as an
OSPF WG document.

Thanks,
Acee


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to