hi dhruv, On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:39:58PM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote: | Hi Shraddha, | | Thanks for your reply, snipping to the open point... | | > Also, it should be stated | > - if are more than one instance of this TLV in RI LSA are allowed. | > | > <Shraddha>More than one instance of the TLV can be added in same RI-LSA or in a multiple instance as defined | > In draft-acee-ospf-rfc4970bis-00.txt | > | Okay, text may be added to reflect this. | | > (2) It should be explicitly stated that - No IANA registry is required to store the meaning or interpretation of.the tag values. | > | > <Shraddha> It's mentioned in the section 4.2 that no well known tag values will be defined by this document. | > | Since in the mailing list there is a discussion about possibility of | having well known tag value assigned by IANA. This document should | clarify (based on WG consensus) if admin tags can be assigned by IANA | in future documents or not. And if the answer is yes, a suitable range | should be set to avoid conflict.
i have no concerns with that - however peter seems in favor of using CAP Bits for well-known applications; would be interesting to hear others' opinion on that. /hannes _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
