David/Ben, Pls see in-line
Rgds shraddha -----Original Message----- From: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:09 PM To: Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: a...@cisco.com; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.sheph...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-...@ietf.org; ospf-cha...@ietf.org; ospf@ietf.org; Black, David <david.bl...@emc.com> Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT) Benoit, > I was initially confused by that sentence. My understanding is that "independent characteristics" applies on a tag-by-tag basis. I might suggest: Each tag carried by the administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate a characteristic of a node that is independent of the characteristics indicated by other administrative tags. <Shraddha> Thanks for the text. Updating -08 version with above text. Thanks, --David > -----Original Message----- > From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:34 AM > To: The IESG > Cc: Black, David; a...@cisco.com; > draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.sheph...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin- t...@ietf.org; ospf-cha...@ietf.org; > ospf@ietf.org > Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: > (with COMMENT) > > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - "Tags carried by the > administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent > characteristics of a node." > > I was initially confused by that sentence. > So there are tags carried by a different TLV than the administrative one? > Actually, no (I checked with one of the authors). > I would simply write: > "Administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent > characteristics of a node." > > This would be in line with the definition: > An administrative Tag is a 32-bit integer value that can be used to > identify a group of nodes in the OSPF domain. > > - Router information LSA [RFC4970] can have link, area or AS > level flooding scope. Choosing the flooding scope to flood the group > tags are defined by the policies and is a local matter. > > "and is a local matter". Hopefully there is some sort of centralized > management application that checks consistency. > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
