Thanks, Benoit
David/Ben,
Pls see in-line
Rgds
shraddha
-----Original Message-----
From: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:09 PM
To: Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: a...@cisco.com; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.sheph...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-...@ietf.org; ospf-cha...@ietf.org; ospf@ietf.org; Black,
David <david.bl...@emc.com>
Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07:
(with COMMENT)
Benoit,
I was initially confused by that sentence.
My understanding is that "independent characteristics" applies on a tag-by-tag
basis. I might suggest:
Each tag carried by the administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to
indicate a characteristic of a node that is independent of the
characteristics indicated by other administrative tags.
<Shraddha> Thanks for the text. Updating -08 version with above text.
Thanks,
--David
-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:34 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: Black, David; a...@cisco.com;
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.sheph...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin- t...@ietf.org; ospf-cha...@ietf.org;
ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07:
(with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
this introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- "Tags carried by the
administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent
characteristics of a node."
I was initially confused by that sentence.
So there are tags carried by a different TLV than the administrative one?
Actually, no (I checked with one of the authors).
I would simply write:
"Administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent
characteristics of a node."
This would be in line with the definition:
An administrative Tag is a 32-bit integer value that can be used to
identify a group of nodes in the OSPF domain.
- Router information LSA [RFC4970] can have link, area or AS
level flooding scope. Choosing the flooding scope to flood the group
tags are defined by the policies and is a local matter.
"and is a local matter". Hopefully there is some sort of centralized
management application that checks consistency.
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
