> On Feb 13, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using ULA for Adj segment/special segment is good option.
absolutely, ULA make sense in many use cases are fully supported in the segment routing architecture. > We can generate these addresses automatically and assign for adjacent > neighbors. sure. s. > > Thanks and Regards, > Veerendranath > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 11 February 2017 01:33 > To: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) <[email protected]>; Veerendranatha Reddy > Vallem <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IPv6 SR] Regarding 128 bits IPv6 address in Segment List of SRH > > On 10/02/2017 22:31, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: > ... >> In the IPv6 dataplane a SID being an IPv6 address, it makes the SID a global >> IPv6 address (even in the case of Adj-SIDs). This of course is orthogonal to >> the control plane that may or may not advertise such address. > > By the way, be careful with the phrase "global IPv6 address". I think you > mean "global scope" (which includes ULA), not "globally reachable" (which > excludes ULA). > > Brian _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
