Hi Shraddha,
please find my comments below:
The draft defines two mechanisms:
a) signaling the link overload to the neighbor. The purpose is to
advertise the link with max-metric from both directions.
b) flooding the Link-Overload sub-TLV inside the area. The purpose is to
let "LSP ingress routers/controllers can learn of the impending
maintenance activity"
1. Why do we need two mechanisms? Why is (b) needed, given that (a)
results in link being advertised with max-metric in both directions?
How is treatement of remote link having max-metric different to the
treatment of a link that has the Link-Overload sub-TLV? I would
understand the difference if you say that the link having the
Link-Overload sub-TLV must not be used during SPF, but nothing like that
is mentioned in the draft and I understand why.
Is (b) needed to cover the case, where the signaling defined in (a) is
not understood by the neighbor on the other side of the link? If yes,
please state it in the draft.
2. For the signaling defined in (a)- using the Router Information LSA
for signaling something to the direct neighbor is a very dirty hack. As
the name of the LSA says, it has been defined to signal capability of
the node, which has nothing to do with what you are trying to use it
for. We have to stop polluting the protocol with such hacks. RFC5613
defines a Link-Local Signaling mechanism for OSPF and that is the one we
should use for siganling between neighbors.
thanks,
Peter
On 19/04/17 15:08 , Shraddha Hegde wrote:
Hi Acee,
New version draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-06 is posted where the remote-ipv4
addr is moved to a new sub-TLV.
Pls review.
The authors of the draft believe that draft has undergone multiple
revisions/reviews and is ready for WG last call.
Rgds
Shraddha
-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 2:28 AM
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt
Hi Shraddha, et al,
With respect to section 4.1, I agree that matching link endpoints in
OSPFv2 requires more information. However, this is a general problem and the
remote address should be a separate OSPFv2 Link Attribute LSA TLV rather than
overloading the link overload TLV ;^)
Thanks,
Acee
On 2/23/17, 11:18 AM, "OSPF on behalf of [email protected]"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF.
Title : OSPF Link Overload
Authors : Shraddha Hegde
Pushpasis Sarkar
Hannes Gredler
Mohan Nanduri
Luay Jalil
Filename : draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt
Pages : 13
Date : 2017-02-23
Abstract:
When a link is being prepared to be taken out of service, the traffic
needs to be diverted from both ends of the link. Increasing the
metric to the highest metric on one side of the link is not
sufficient to divert the traffic flowing in the other direction.
It is useful for routers in an OSPFv2 or OSPFv3 routing domain to be
able to advertise a link being in an overload state to indicate
impending maintenance activity on the link. This information can be
used by the network devices to re-route the traffic effectively.
This document describes the protocol extensions to disseminate link-
overload information in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
.
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
