Dear All,
yes/support (readability needs some work)
Couple nits:
- Introduction.
- Perhaps "Some networks use tunnels for a variety of reasons, such
as:" may be re-worded as "There my be number of reasons why
different types
of tunneling technique has been used in networks, among these are:"
- "The ingress needs to select a type of tunnel which is supported by
the egress." I think that the idea is to find match between set
of tunnels
supported by the ingress and the egress.
- Section 3
- s/Routers advertises/Routers advertise/
- It is stated that "The Encapsulation Capability TLV SHOULD NOT
appear more than once within a given OSPF Router Information (RI) Opaque
LSA." What happens when it does appear more than once? Discard LSA? TLV?
Regards,
Greg
>
> *From: *OSPF <[email protected]> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <
> [email protected]>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 07:45
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *[OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF
> (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02)
>
>
>
> This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
> support and/or
>
> comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 12th, 2017.
>
>
>
> For your convenience, here is the URL for the subject document.
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02.txt
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list
> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
