Hi Xiaohu, thank you for your most expedient response and kind consideration of my comments. I've just noticed typo in my own proposal s/There my/There may/. And just one more question, why you propose to use SHOULD in "... the first occurrence SHOULD be processed ..." Would MUST be more appropriate here? Or you envision that in some circumstances this policy may be changed?
Regards, Greg On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Xuxiaohu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > Thanks for your support and your comments. Please see my response inline. > > > > *发件人:* OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] *代表 *Greg Mirsky > *发送时间:* 2017年5月9日 5:49 > *收件人:* Acee Lindem (acee) > *抄送:* OSPF WG List > *主题:* Re: [OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF > (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02) > > > > Dear All, > > yes/support (readability needs some work) > > > > Couple nits: > > - Introduction. > > > - Perhaps "Some networks use tunnels for a variety of reasons, such > as:" may be re-worded as "There my be number of reasons why different > types > of tunneling technique has been used in networks, among these are:" > > [Xiaohu] Will update it. > > - "The ingress needs to select a type of tunnel which is supported by > the egress." I think that the idea is to find match between set of > tunnels > supported by the ingress and the egress. > > [Xiaohu] Yes. Will add more words to clarify it. > > - Section 3 > > > - s/Routers advertises/Routers advertise/ > - It is stated that "The Encapsulation Capability TLV SHOULD NOT > appear more than once within a given OSPF Router Information (RI) Opaque > LSA." What happens when it does appear more than once? Discard LSA? TLV? > > [Xiaohu] Thanks for pointing out this. How about adding the following text > for clarification “If the Encapsulation Capability TLV appears more than once > in an OSPF Router Information LSA, only the first occurrence SHOULD be > processed and others MUST be ignored.” > > Best regards, > > Xiaohu > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > > > > > *From: *OSPF <[email protected]> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 07:45 > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF > (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02) > > > > This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your > support and/or > > comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 12th, 2017. > > > > For your convenience, here is the URL for the subject document. > > > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02.txt > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > >
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
