On Monday 04 February 2008 22:49:18 Hannu Savolainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO using dynamic allocation for tables that are just few kilobytes is
> overkill when the total size of ossxmix is in megabytes. It just makes
> the code unnecessarily complicated. So I would not like to accept this
> patch.
>
> However what you can do is to decrease MAX_DEVS to something like 16. In
> real world there will never be more than 16 mixers in OSS 4.0 systems.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hannu
OK, but I'll still need to make a patch, because I didn't use MAX_DEVS
correctly before - it is used both at variables such as root or set_counter
(when the limit is the number of mixers in systems), and at variables like
extnames (which should be a double array - the limit is the number of mixers
* number of controls), so it ended up very large to allow for the latter. Any
idea for a good limit for the number of controls?
Yours,
Yair K.
_______________________________________________
oss-devel mailing list
oss-devel@mailman.opensound.com
http://mailman.opensound.com/mailman/listinfo/oss-devel
