Thanks for starting this discussion.  I have reported a number of issues 
recently, including - #2149789,  #2150261,  #2149775,  #2150316 - three of 
which are identified by the team as critical, and one as high.  The oslo rabbit 
MITM is also critical, IMHO, but I agree it cannot be fixed without potentially 
breaking many poorly configured deployments and so must be 'Class B'.  An 
awkward situation to be sure, but the solution is understandable.     

For what it's worth my goal is not to 'mine security gold', rather I am trying 
to find and test potential solutions for sovereign cloud. 



More to the point of the thread, I think there is also a more pressing issue 
adjacent to the disclosure-process question: large, long-lived projects such as 
OpenStack have a substantial backlog of legacy vulnerabilities and insecure 
patterns that are now becoming much easier to discover with LLM assistance.

That changes the risk calculation. Issues that previously required deep project 
knowledge, persistence, or specialized tooling may now be within reach of many 
more people. We should assume adversaries can use the same leverage, including 
for insider attacks and for chaining individually modest bugs across trust 
boundaries.

In that sense, this feels like a generational security event. The urgent 
question is not only whether embargoed details might leak through LLM use, but 
whether maintainers can harden exposed systems faster than attackers can 
rediscover and combine old weaknesses.

That argues for shorter exposure windows, more proactive hardening, and more 
attention to eliminating vulnerable patterns before they become practical 
attack paths.

Furthermore, it argues for assertive use of modern LLMs, especially for code 
review and vulnerability discovery. I have volunteered to help with this for 
the OpenStack VMT, and would be happy to do so again here.



Cheers,



Tim.

PS: LLMs helped with this email, and with more and more of the work I do. I 
think we need to move forward with these tools more deliberately and less 
fearfully.
Confidential communication. No warranties or commitments unless in a signed 
agreement. If received in error, notify sender and delete. Unauthorized use 
prohibited.



Reply via email to