People are shooting the messengers here. The fact is - we are going through a generational security event due to the advancement of LLMs.
It is also both trivial and extremely effective to use Agentic analysis to filter security reports. As for 'duplicates', people are claiming this when I have seen little evidence. I reported a dozen or so to one major project and no one has yet claimed invalid or duplicate. Moreover, if 'duplicates' are found, then that is a good signal for prioritization. Let's stop talking about how the vulns are found and start fixing them with urgency. ROI AI From: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:52:37 -0700 Subject: Re: [oss-security] Coordinated Disclosure in the LLM Age On 4/28/26 07:58, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I'm sorely tempted, both due to the increased volume and the risk of > premature > disclosure, to just assume that any vulnerability reported as a result of > research using an LLM is trivially discoverable by others, and give up trying > to > pretend there's any point to working it under embargo. Other maintainers under similar floods seem to agree: Linux kernel: - https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/5/17/896 - https://docs.kernel.org/process/security-bugs.html DNS servers (BIND, Unbound, PowerDNS): - https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/contributions/1233/ - https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/56/contributions/1233/attachments/1180/2539/presentation.pdf -- -Alan Coopersmith- mailto:[email protected] Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris Confidential communication. No warranties or commitments unless in a signed agreement. If received in error, notify sender and delete. Unauthorized use prohibited.
