Hi,

I had similar problems with Solaris 10 installation. The patched version 
so far works OK for me - no rapid explosion of zombies. Looks like 
trying to close already closed FD was the problem:

4226:   vfork()                                         = 8956
8956:   vfork()         (returning as child ...)        = 4226
8956:   lwp_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x00000000, 0x00000000) = 0xFFBFFEFF 
[0x0000FFF
F]
8956:   close(8)                                        = 0
8956:   close(8)                                        Err#9 EBADF
8956:   _exit(127)


Rgds,

MS


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am wondering where my last post is... Hm, trying again:
>
> I tried it on the same Solaris 8 machine:
>
> (machine:root) # date
> Mon May 26 09:59:34 MEST 2008
> (machine:root) # cd /var/ossec/bin
> (machine:root) # ./ossec-control start
> Starting OSSEC HIDS v1.5 (by Daniel B. Cid)...
> Started ossec-maild...
> Started ossec-execd...
> Started ossec-analysisd...
> Started ossec-logcollector...
> Started ossec-syscheckd...
> Started ossec-monitord...
> Completed.
> (machine:root) # /usr/ucb/ps aux |grep ossec
> root     27466  1.1  0.3 2368 1200 ?        S 09:59:57  0:00
> /var/ossec/bin/oss
> ossec    27458  1.0  0.4 2888 1952 ?        S 09:59:56  0:00
> /var/ossec/bin/oss
> root     27462  0.1  0.3 2168 1096 ?        S 09:59:56  0:00
> /var/ossec/bin/oss
> ossec    27470  0.1  0.2 2144 1008 ?        S 09:59:57  0:00
> /var/ossec/bin/oss
> ossecm   27449  0.1  0.2 2160 1024 ?        S 09:59:56  0:00
> /var/ossec/bin/oss
> (machine:root) # /usr/ucb/ps aux |grep defunc
> ossecm   27512  0.0  0.0    0    0          Z           0:00
> <defunct>
> (machine:root) # /usr/ucb/ps aux |grep defunc
> (machine:root) # /usr/ucb/ps aux |grep defunc
> (machine:root) # date
> Mon May 26 10:20:01 MEST 2008
> (machine:root) # /usr/ucb/ps aux |grep defunc
> (machine:root) #
>
> There was still a zombie for a moment. But it looks much better now.
> What was the problem?
> I'll keep an eye on it and inform you, if I notice some strange
> behavior.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Matthias
>
>   


Reply via email to