Okay, thanks! It'll be a few days, at least, before I have access to our HP-UX systems to try these - we're in the middle of a testing cycle right now. But once I can I'll let you know what happens.
On Sep 6, 2:11 pm, dan <[email protected]> wrote: > Like I said, I haven't tested these (beyond compiling them on a system > WITH ipv6). They may not work at all > > These are simple code diffs. To apply cd into the ossec-hids-2.6/src > directory and run "patch -p0 < os_net.diff" and "patch -p0 < > client-agent.diff" > > It should look something like: > > [ddp@ix] :; patch -p0 < /tmp/os_net.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff -u ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/os_net/os_net.c ./os_net/os_net.c > |--- ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/os_net/os_net.c Mon Jul 11 15:36:59 2011 > |+++ ./os_net/os_net.c Tue Sep 6 16:04:09 2011 > -------------------------- > Patching file ./os_net/os_net.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 103. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 112. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 137. > Hunk #6 succeeded at 163. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 302. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 356. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 380. > Hunk #10 succeeded at 404. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff -u ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/os_net/os_net.h ./os_net/os_net.h > |--- ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/os_net/os_net.h Mon Jul 11 15:36:59 2011 > |+++ ./os_net/os_net.h Tue Sep 6 16:00:05 2011 > -------------------------- > Patching file ./os_net/os_net.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 23. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 43. > > and > > [ddp@ix] :; patch -p0 < /tmp/client-agent.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff -u ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/client-agent/start_agent.c > ./client-agent/start_agent.c > |--- ../../2/ossec-hids-2.6/src/client-agent/start_agent.c Mon Jul > 11 15:36:58 2011 > |+++ ./client-agent/start_agent.c Tue Sep 6 16:11:03 2011 > -------------------------- > Patching file ./client-agent/start_agent.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 101. > done > > Good luck! > dan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 01:29:36PM -0700, Alisha Kloc wrote: > > Daniel, > > > Is that something that can be added as a switch to an official > > release? We are absolutely forbidden from modifying source code, so we > > wouldn't be able to do it ourselves. > > > Dan, > > > I'd offer to test those when our HP-UX systems become available again, > > but I have no idea what they're telling me - I'm not a programmer and > > we don't do code on this project. Sorry! > > > On Sep 6, 1:16?pm, dan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't have an ipv6-less system to test this, but these MAY work > > > on an agent. > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:32:02AM -0700, Alisha Kloc wrote: > > > > Well, crud. We need HP-UX support and if we can't compile the agents > > > > because of IPv6, I guess that means we won't be upgrading past OSSEC > > > > 2.5. > > > > > Does OSSEC still have that bug tracker/feature request site? I don't > > > > know if we're a corner case or what, but if it's not too difficult to > > > > add, I really would like to file it as a feature request. > > > > > On Sep 5, 11:41?am, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There isn't currently a way to disable ipv6 like that. > > > > ?os_net.diff > > > 6KViewDownload > > > > ?client-agent.diff > > > < 1KViewDownload > > > > os_net.diff > 6KViewDownload > > client-agent.diff > < 1KViewDownload
