On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: > So, would you agree that OSSEC 2.6 is just fine and the problem is > with the Atomic RPMs? >
Yes. I've notified them (via IRC) that there is an issue. > Do you know if the rpm spec files will be updated anytime soon? > In the OSSEC source or Atomic's spec files? If you mean the OSSEC ones, probably whenever someone sends in an update. They're not something that's high on the priority list, especially since they're in the "contrib" directory. I am kind of looking at them though. :P
