On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: > I wanted to look into this further, but I haven't had a lot of time. > Please let us know what you find. I think we're on our own as far as > getting working RPMs are concerned. >
What do you mean you're on your own? > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Kat <[email protected]> wrote: >> Anyone every come up with a solution to this? I built rpms from the >> Atomic SPEC (modified) and same issue - if I replace "any" with the >> IP, it works, and I don't have to extract or reset the client end, it >> just magically starts working with I replace "any" with the IP. >> >> Trying to figure out what, in the SPEC file/build, might be causing >> this. >> >> Going to start looking through the build process and the SPEC file and >> see if I can figure it out, unless someone already has. >> >> thanks >> >> On Oct 11, 4:35 pm, "dan (ddp)" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Joe S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > So, would you agree that OSSEC 2.6 is just fine and the problem is >>> > with the Atomic RPMs? >>> >>> Yes. I've notified them (via IRC) that there is an issue. >>> >> >
